TITLE

Information for peer reviewers

AUTHOR(S)
Huston, Patricia
PUB. DATE
April 1994
SOURCE
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;4/15/1994, Vol. 150 Issue 8, p1211
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
35493895

 

Related Articles

  • An Eric Digest: Peer Review of Teachers. Hertling, Elizabeth // Teacher Librarian;Dec99, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p26 

    Provides information on peer review for teachers to pass teacher-licensing exam. Description of peer review; Examples of peer review programs; Potential benefits of peer review; Potential problems of peer review; Future of peer review.

  • The paradox of peer review. Pulec, Jack L. // ENT: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal;Apr1998, Vol. 77 Issue 4, p244 

    Editorial. Focuses on the system of peer review. Principles of peer review; Good and bad things about peer review; Information on the International Congress on Biomedical Peer Review and Global Communications in Prague, Czech Republic.

  • Evidence on peer review--scientific quality control or smokescreen? Goldbeck-Wood, Sandra // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);01/02/99, Vol. 318 Issue 7175, p44 

    Discusses the importance of the scientific quality control process in peer review. Information on peer review process; Beneficiaries of the peer review system; Speculations on quality review; Major challenges in the process.

  • EDITORIAL Tellus launches an electronic submission and peer-review system. Rodhe, Henning // Tellus: Series B;Sep2003, Vol. 55 Issue 4, p855 

    Presents information on the online submission and peer-review system of the journal "Tellus."

  • Correspondence: Changing trends in peer review. Hubbard, Penny // European Science Editing;May2012, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p56 

    The article offers information on the importance of peer reviewing for maintaining the quality of journals.

  • The Status of Peer Review. Griffin-Sobel, Joyce P. // AMWA Journal: American Medical Writers Association Journal;2006, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p57 

    Comments on the status of peer review. Details of the process of peer review; Factors behind manuscript decisions; Information on the studies that were presented at the 5th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication in Chicago, Illinois.

  • Peer reviews improve reliability of CPA reports.  // ABA Banking Journal;May99, Vol. 91 Issue 5, p70 

    Discusses the use of peer reviews for verifying the quality of work of certified public accountants. Reasons for using peer reviews; Information on the peer review process; Views of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants on the practice.

  • Opening up BMJ peer review. Smith, Richard // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);01/02/99, Vol. 318 Issue 7175, p4 

    Editorial. Provides information on the system that is being used by the `British Medical Journal' for peer review. How the system works; Definition of peer review as a scientific process; Benefits of peer review.

  • What's up with peer review? Stevens, Michael G. // Practical Accountant;Apr98, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p45 

    Discusses the changes in the peer review program in relation to accounting in the United States. Remarks from the Chair of the SEC Practice Section Peer Review Program, Thomas A. McGrath, Jr.; Internet address for information on peer review; Information on the peer review standards. INSET:...

  • Peer Review: Continuing an AFP Tradition.  // American Family Physician;4/15/2001, Vol. 63 Issue 8, p1463 

    Focuses on the move taken by the `American Family Physician' periodical to inform readers of their peer-review process. Details of the peer-review process; Reasons for the move.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics