Is emergency medicine a specialty? Quebec MDs disagree over controversial issue

Martin, Michael
May 1992
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;5/1/1992, Vol. 146 Issue 9, p1632
Academic Journal
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • Study of heart attack survival rates draws rebuke from AAFP.  // Primary Care Weekly;1/13/97, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p3 

    Details the controversy generated by a study linking survival rate of heart attack patients with the specialties of the doctors, being claimed by the American Academy of Family Physicians as erroneous. Publication of the study in the December 19, 1996 issue of the `New England Journal of...

  • Do We Need a New Specialty? An Editorial Reply. Rathbone, J.H. // Journal of Palliative Medicine;Fall1998, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p293 

    Comments on the need for specialty in palliative medicine. Rationale for viewing palliative care as a branch of oncology rather than a separate specialty; Concerns over the emergence of palliative medicine as a recognized specialty; Limitations of palliative care.

  • Accident and emergency medicine: an administrative convenience or a specialty? Brown, D. R. // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;Jan1989, Vol. 82 Issue 1, p58 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Accident and emergency medicine: an administrative convenience or a specialty?" by Dallos in the March 1988 issue.

  • Accident and emergency medicine: an administrative convenience or a specialty? Khan, M. A. // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;Sep1988, Vol. 81 Issue 9, p557 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article about the question on accident and emergency medicine as an administrative convenience or a specialty in the March 1988 issue.

  • The Emergence of Physician-Owned Specialty Hospitals.  // New England Journal of Medicine;2/10/2005, Vol. 352 Issue 6, p638 

    A correction to the article "The Emergence of Physician-Owned Specialty Hospitals," that was previously published in the January 2005 issue of the "New England Journal of Medicine" is presented.

  • Closed encounters.  // U.S. News & World Report;3/13/89, Vol. 106 Issue 10, p17 

    Describes an incident in which two senators disagree over the John Tower controversy. Edited by C. Fenyvesi

  • CURRENT COMMENT.  // America;4/15/1950, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p31 

    The article covers various issues of interest to the Catholic Church as of April 15, 1950. The controversial natural-gas bill has been approved by the U.S. House of Representatives by a vote of 176 to 174. A dispute is expected to emerge in the U.S. Senate over the omnibus foreign-aid bill. A...

  • Letters. Vogel, Martin; Roper, Mark; Gordon, Michael; BĂ©langer, François P.; Drummond, Alan; Armstrong, Paul W.; Cashman, Neil R.; Cook, Deborah J.; Feeny, David H.; Ghali, William A.; de Gruijl, Frank R.; Hall, Judith G.; Herbert, Carol P.; Iscoe, Neill; Jadad, Alejandro R.; Kassirer, Jerome P.; McAlister, Finlay A.; McGeer, Allison J.; MacMillan, Harriet L.; Moher, David // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;11/26/2002, Vol. 167 Issue 11, p1228 

    Presents letters to the editor on topics related to medicine. The physician-patient relationship, emergency medicine, and Bill 114 in Quebec province; Letter to the Canadian Medical Association from the editorial board of this journal; The ethics of editorializing; Issue of free enterprise in...

  • Unquiet Grave. Stewart, Robert // Horizon Canada (English edition);Jan2001, pN.PAG 

    Details the controversy over the burial of typographer Joseph Guibord in Quebec. Association of Guibord with the Insitut canadien; Refusal of the Catholic Church to provide burial service; Elevation of the incident into a national issue regarding the separation of church and state.

  • "Kill the Sea Turtles" and Other Things You Can't Make the Government Say. Gaylord, Scott W. // Washington & Lee Law Review;Winter2014, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p93 

    In Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, the Supreme Court confirmed that there is no heckler's veto under the government speech doctrine. When speaking, the government has the right to speak for itself and to select the views that it wants to express. But the Court acknowledged that sometimes it is...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics