Rinchuse, Donald J.; Rinchuse, Daniel J.; Kandasamy, Sanjivan; Ackerman, Marc B.
June 2008
World Journal of Orthodontics;2008, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p167
Academic Journal
Much has been written in support of systematic reviews and the randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses upon which they are based. Clearly, the medical profession (as opposed to the dental profession) has been the leader in publishing the benefits of systematic reviews over the traditional, qualitative narrative reviews. At the same time, the medical profession also appears to be ahead of the dental profession in recognizing the limitations of such reviews. That said, there are a number of inherent problems with systematic reviews, as well as the randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses that back them up. To better facilitate evidence-based decision making, this article discusses the shortcomings of systematic reviews so that practitioners are fully aware of their drawbacks, as well as their benefits.


Related Articles

  • Management and treatment of peri-implant conditions. Moghaddas, Omid // Journal of Isfahan Dental School;2012, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p480 

    Introduction: Development of implant dentistry is one of the major advances in the dental science. With the development of implants in this field, implantologists face the inevitable challenge of how to deal with problems associated with implants. Studies so far have focused on surgical and...

  • Rapid maxillary expansion treatment could produce long-term transverse skeletal changes. Ren, Yijin // Evidence-Based Dentistry;Dec2005, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p92 

    Data sources Medline, Medline In-Process and other Medline nonindexed citations, LILACS, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched. Search terms were rapid palatal expansion or rapid maxillary expansion (RME), bone and bones or skeletal changes. Reference lists from...

  • Periodontal health during clear aligners treatment: a systematic review. Rossini, Gabriele; Parrini, Simone; Castroflorio, Tommaso; Deregibus, Andrea; Debernardi, Cesare L. // European Journal of Orthodontics;Oct2015, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p539 

    Background: Clear aligner treatment (CAT) has been cited as a safe and comfortable orthodontic procedure for adult patients. However, the available evidence is scarce. Objective: To perform a systematic review of the existing literature in order to assess periodontal health during CAT. Search...

  • A Systematic Review of Individual Motivational Factors in Orthodontic Treatment: Facial Attractiveness as the Main Motivational Factor in Orthodontic Treatment. Samsonyanov√°, Lusine; Broukal, Zdenek // International Journal of Dentistry;2014, p1 

    Introduction. Physical, mental, and social consequences of malocclusion may impact the quality of life. The aim of this review is to describe main factors motivating parents for orthodontic treatment for their children. Methods. A systematic review study design was used to identify articles...

  • Twenty Years of the Cochrane Collaboration. Worthington, H.V.; Glenny, A.-M.; Clarkson, J.E. // Journal of Dental Research;Aug2013, Vol. 92 Issue 8, p680 

    The Cochrane Collaboration is 20 years old this year. Established in 1993, the Collaboration has sought to provide an up-to-date, critical evidence base for all those involved in health care decision-making at a variety of levels. This article illustrates the work of the Cochrane Oral Health...

  • Evidence not strong enough to advocate powered toothbrushes over manual for orthodontic patients. Chia, Matthew // Evidence-Based Dentistry;Sep2008, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p78 

    Data sourcesStudies were sourced using Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Institute for Scientific Information proceedings, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, UMI Proquest, Trials Central (www.trialscentral.org) and the metaregister of...

  • RCTs in orthopaedics: The challenge of doing them right. Hayashi, Annie C. // AAOS Now;May2011, Vol. 5 Issue 5, p47 

    The article focuses on the methodologic issues in conducting correctly the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthopaedics. According to orthopaedic suergeon Mohit Bhandari, although RCTs are conducted in orthopaedics, their quality and quantity are lacking. A graph showing the number and...

  • Net Reclassification Improvement: Computation, Interpretation, and Controversies. Leening, Maarten J. G.; Vedder, Moniek M.; Witteman, Jacqueline C. M.; Pencina, Michael J.; Steyerberg, Ewout W. // Annals of Internal Medicine;1/21/2014, Vol. 160 Issue 2, p122 

    The net reclassification improvement (NRI) is an increasingly popular measure for evaluating improvements in risk predictions. This article details a review of 67 publications in high-impact general clinical journals that considered the NRI. Incomplete reporting of NRI methods, incorrect...

  • Using metaanalysis to evaluate evidence: practical tips and traps. Lam, Raymond W.; Kennedy, Sidney H. // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry;Mar2005, Vol. 50 Issue 3, p167 

    Although practising evidence-based medicine is the goal of most physicians, it can be a real challenge to sift through the vast body of data to determine the best strategies. Most clinical guidelines regard replicated randomized controlled trials (RCTs), metaanalyses, and systematic reviews as...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics