TITLE

Repeatability intraexaminer and agreement in amplitude of accommodation measurements

AUTHOR(S)
F. Barra; A. Barrio; E. Gonzalez; I. Sanchez
PUB. DATE
January 2009
SOURCE
Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology;Jan2009, Vol. 247 Issue 1, p121
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background  Clinical measurement of the amplitude of accommodation (AA) provides an indication of maximum accommodative ability. To determine whether there has been a significant change in the AA, it is important to have a good idea of the repeatability of the measurement method used. The aim of the present study was to compare AA measurements made using three different subjective clinical methods: the push-up, push-down, and minus lens techniques. These methods differ in terms of the apparent size of the target, the end point used, or the components of the accommodation response stimulated. Our working hypothesis was that these methods are likely to show different degrees of repeatability such that they should not be used interchangeably. Methods  The AA of the right eye was measured on two separate occasions in 61 visually normal subjects of mean age 19.7 years (range 18 to 32). The repeatability of the tests and agreement between them was estimated by the Bland and Altman method. We determined the mean difference (MD) and the 95% limits of agreement for the repeatability study (COR) and for the agreement study (COA). Results  The COR for the push-up, push-down, and minus lens techniques were ±4.76, ±4.00, and ±2.52D, respectively. Higher values of AA were obtained using the push-up procedure compared to the push-down and minus lens methods. The push-down method also yielded a larger mean AA than the negative-lens method. MD between the three methods were high in clinical terms, always over 1.75D, and the COA differed substantially by at least ±4.50D. The highest agreement interval was observed when we compared AA measurements made using minus lenses and the push-up method (±5.65D). Conclusions  The minus lens method exhibited the best repeatability, least MD (−0.08D) and the smallest COR. Agreement between the three techniques was poor.
ACCESSION #
35362729

 

Related Articles

  • Robust and optimal use of information in stereo vision. Porrill, John; Frisby, John P.; Adams, Wendy J.; Buckley, David // Nature;1/7/1999, Vol. 397 Issue 6714, p63 

    Considers research investigating methods of evaluating human visual perception. The Beyesian approach of comparison with the performance of a statistically optimal observer; The added element of robust visual perception in the comparison observer and its results; The different effect of...

  • Tek Taraflı Ãœst Oblik Felcinin Tedavisinde Alt Oblik Kasın Anterior Transpozisyonu. Altınkaynak, Hasan; Akar, Serpil; Alp, Dilek; Gökyiğit, Birsen; Dundar, Hüseyin; Kara, Necip; Yılmaz, Ömer Faruk // Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology / Turk Oftalmoloji Dergisi;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 41 Issue 6, p392 

    Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral anterior transposition of the inferior oblique (ATIO) muscle in patients with unilateral superior oblique palsy (SOP). Material and Method: In this study, the medical records of 52 patients with SOP were retrospectively reviewed. The...

  • How to Get Started with NIGHT & DAY.  // Review of Optometry;1/15/2004 Supplement, p13 

    Provides tips on how to implement own clinical trials of silicon hydrogels in ten patients.

  • Lens aims to increase range of accommodation. Guttman, Cheryl // Ophthalmology Times;5/1/2004, Vol. 29 Issue 9, p39 

    Reports on clinical trials in Germany and Colombia to evaluate a dual-optic accommodating IOL (Synchrony, Visogen) designed to offer amplified, consistent accommodation across a wide range of IOL powers, according to Stephen D. McLeod. Two flexible silicone optics of the system; Design,...

  • Comparison of the Efficacy and Longevity of Nonpenetrating Glaucoma Surgery With and Without a New, Nonabsorbable Hydrophilic Implant. Dahan, Elie; Ravinet, Emilie; Ben-Simon, Guy J.; Mermoud, Andre // Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers & Imaging;Nov/Dec2003, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p457 

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and longevity of nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery with and without the use of a nonabsorbable hydrophilic implant at the Oxford Eye Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa, and the Glaucoma Unit, Jules Gonin Ophthalmic Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland....

  • Personalized Progressives: A Clinical Review.  // Review of Optometry;7/15/2010 Personalized Progressives, p2 

    The article discusses the suitability of progressive addition lenses (PAL) made by Zeiss Individual. It presents an unpublished clinical trial of experienced PAL wearers wearing customized free-from PAL spectacles and semi-finished PAL spectacles. It also explores some feedback from doctors that...

  • Why fit children with contact lenses? Walline, Jeffrey J. // Ophthalmology Times;5/15/2006, Vol. 31 Issue 10, p51 

    The article discusses the issue of use of contact lenses by young children. It is often reported by the parents that many eye care practitioners recommend the use of contact lenses by young children. But at the same time other practitioners say that children below the age of 12 years should not...

  • ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study. Scherer, Roberta W.; Huynh, Lynn; Ervin, Ann-Margret; Taylor, Jakeisha; Dickersin, Kay // BMC Medical Research Methodology;2013, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: The inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in conference abstracts in systematic reviews is controversial, partly because study design information and risk of bias is often not fully reported in the abstract. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology...

  • Unlimited Capacity Parallel Quantity Comparison of Multiple Integers. Blanc-Goldhammer, Daryn R.; Cohen, Dale J. // Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition;Sep2014, Vol. 40 Issue 5, p1389 

    Research has shown that integer comparison is quick and efficient. This efficiency may be a function of the structure of the integer comparison system. The present study tests whether integers are compared with an unlimited capacity system or a limited capacity system. We tested these models...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics