TITLE

Use of progression-free survival as a surrogate marker in oncology trials: some regulatory issues

AUTHOR(S)
Chakravarty, Aloka; Sridhara, Rajeshwari
PUB. DATE
October 2008
SOURCE
Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Oct2008, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p515
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
There has been interest in using progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in oncology clinical trials. In order to objectively define this endpoint, clear understanding of what progression means, how it is measured and what its implications are need to be discussed. This article discusses some regulatory aspects of using progression-free survival as an endpoint.
ACCESSION #
35355529

 

Related Articles

  • Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in early colorectal cancer from the clinician's perspective. Grothey, Axel // Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Oct2008, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p529 

    The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of stage III colon cancer to prolong disease-free survival (DFS) and increase overall survival (OS) has been clinical standard since the early 1990s. Recently, 3-year DFS was recognized as surrogate endpoint for OS based on a...

  • Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a clinician's perspective. Piedbois, Pascal; Croswell, Jennifer Miller // Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Oct2008, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p519 

    Surrogate endpoints in oncology research and practice have garnered increasing attention over the past two decades. This activity has largely been driven by the promise surrogate endpoints appear to hold: the potential to get new therapies to seriously ill patients more rapidly. However,...

  • Evaluating time to cancer recurrence as a surrogate marker for survival from an information theory perspective. Alonso, Ariel; Molenberghs, Geert // Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Oct2008, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p497 

    The last two decades have seen a lot of development in the area of surrogate marker validation. One of these approaches places the evaluation in a meta-analytic framework, leading to definitions in terms of trial- and individual-level association. A drawback of this methodology is that different...

  • Two simple approaches for validating a binary surrogate endpoint using data from multiple trials. Baker, Stuart G. // Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Oct2008, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p505 

    A surrogate endpoint is an endpoint that is observed before a true endpoint and is used to draw conclusions about the effect of intervention on true endpoint. To gauge confidence in the use of a surrogate endpoint, it must be validated. Two simple validation methods using data from multiple...

  • Systemic Analysis of Predictive Biomarkers for Recurrence in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Surgery. Mori, Koichiro; Toiyama, Yuji; Saigusa, Susumu; Fujikawa, Hiroyuki; Hiro, Junichiro; Kobayashi, Minako; Ohi, Masaki; Araki, Toshimitsu; Inoue, Yasuhiro; Tanaka, Koji; Mohri, Yasuhiko; Kusunoki, Masato // Digestive Diseases & Sciences;Aug2015, Vol. 60 Issue 8, p2477 

    Background: Preoperative serum systemic inflammatory response (SIR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) has been reported to be a predictive biomarker of early recurrence. The molecular status of CRC, including microsatellite instability (MSI), BRAF and KRAS mutations, and...

  • Focus on 16p13.3 Locus in Colon Cancer. Mampaey, Evi; Fieuw, Annelies; Van Laethem, Thalia; Ferdinande, Liesbeth; Claes, Kathleen; Ceelen, Wim; Van Nieuwenhove, Yves; Pattyn, Piet; De Man, Marc; De Ruyck, Kim; Van Roy, Nadine; Geboes, Karen; Laurent, St├ęphanie // PLoS ONE;7/29/2015, Vol. 10 Issue 7, p1 

    Background: With one million new cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed annually in the world, CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the Western world. Patients with stage I-III CRC can be cured with surgery but are at risk for recurrence. Colorectal cancer is characterized by...

  • Surrogate endpoint validation: statistical elegance versus clinical relevance. Green, E. M.; Yothers, G.; Sargent, Daniel J. // Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Oct2008, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p477 

    A variety of approaches have been proposed to provide formal and informal validation of proposed surrogate markers. To achieve true clinical impact, the validation must convince both the statistical and clinical communities. In this paper, we argue that the best approach is not a single method...

  • Impact of Biomarkers Expression Before and After Portal Vein Embolization on Recurrence After Two-Stage Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Narita, Masato; Oussoultzoglou, Elie; Chenard, Marie-Pierre; Fuchshuber, Pascal; Rosso, Edoardo; Pessaux, Patrick; Jaeck, Daniel; Bachellier, Philippe // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;Mar2012, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p554 

    Background: The adverse oncological effect of portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) remains controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of PVE on change of tumor characteristics using tumor specimens obtained from sequential...

  • Circulating miR-378 in plasma: a reliable, haemolysis-independent biomarker for colorectal cancer. Zanutto, S; Pizzamiglio, S; Ghilotti, M; Bertan, C; Ravagnani, F; Perrone, F; Leo, E; Pilotti, S; Verderio, P; Gariboldi, M; Pierotti, M A // British Journal of Cancer;2/18/2014, Vol. 110 Issue 4, p1001 

    Background:Plasma circulating tumour-specific microRNAs (miRNAs) are promising biomarkers of tumour presence and recurrence, especially for diseases whose best chance of successful treatment requires early diagnosis and timely surgery of an already malignant but not yet invasive tumour, such as...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics