Leaner Leadership

November 2008
HealthLeaders Magazine;Nov2008, Vol. 11 Issue 11, p39
The article focuses on the downsizing strategy of hospital administrators in the U.S. It is mentioned that restructuring the hospital and health system organizations' work force is a way to better meet the needs of their community while remaining financially viable. Susie Krentz, senior principal and practice director of the strategy practice at Noblis' Center for Health Innovation, cites four reasons why organizations cut their administrative positions, which include the economic crisis and bureaucracy in hospitals. INSET: LAYING OFF LONGTIME STAFFERS.


Related Articles

  • Employers cited for breach of Sustaining Progress.  // World of Irish Nursing & Midwifery;May2005, Vol. 13 Issue 5, p12 

    The article reports that health employers have been cited for breaching Sustaining Progress by all health service unions in Ireland. This follows with the publication of the Health Services Executive (HSE)'s health service plan for 2005, which involves the loss of 600 jobs within the health...

  • Hospital downsizing and workforce reduction strategies: some inner workings. Weil, Thomas P. // Health Services Management Research;Feb2003, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p13 

    Downsizing, manpower reductions, re-engineering, and resizing are used extensively in the United States to reduce cost and to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of various functions and processes. Published studies report that these managerial strategies result in a minimal impact on...

  • Trust ploughs on with job cuts. Snow, Tamsin // Nursing Standard;5/9/2007, Vol. 21 Issue 35, p13 

    The article reports on the reduction of staffs at the Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust in Great Britain. It is stated that the hospital's board of trustees includes the plan of reducing posts wipe out its deficit. Information about their management on the...

  • Exploring the consequences of workforce reduction. Wagar, Terry H. // Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (Canadian Journal of;Dec98, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p300 

    Examines the relationship between permanent workforce reduction and three sets of outcomes. Impact of downsizing on the survivors; Consequences of downsizing; High-involvement workplace strategy; Conclusion.

  • Lessons learned. Nelson, Debra L.; Burke, Ronald J. // Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (Canadian Journal of;Dec98, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p372 

    Presents lessons learned about downsizing. Reason organizations downsize; Advantages of downsizing; Effectiveness of downsizing; Guidelines for future downsizing efforts; Factors to improve in downsizing; Conclusion.

  • Surviving corporate downsizing talk. Sherman, Lynn // Bond Buyer;04/22/99, Vol. 328 Issue 30625, p31 

    Focuses on how to survive a corporate downsizing. Handling of responsibilities of departing co-workers.

  • Corporations should offer more attention to downsizing survivors.  // Corporate Board;Sep/Oct96, Vol. 17 Issue 100, p26 

    Reports on the importance for corporations to be aware of the needs of employees who survive a reorganization. Possible reduction in productivity and profit loss following downsizing; Focus on collaboration among workers and not competition; Need to train workers for additional duties.

  • The Downsizing Sequel: Surviving Corporate Change. Kelly, Beth // Grand Rapids Business Journal;9/23/2002, Vol. 20 Issue 38, p29 

    Discusses tips on surviving a downsizing situation. Helping of laid-off friends; Options of downsized employees; Keeping things in perspective.

  • Work-force board facing potential cutbacks. Watt, Katherine // Inside Tucson Business;03/26/2001, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p20 

    Reports on the possible downsizing of the Pima County Workforce Investment Board in Arizona. Budget boost of the Arizona Department of Education; Retraining of young workers.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics