TITLE

Limb performance and patient satisfaction after radial artery harvesting: endoscopic versus open techniques

AUTHOR(S)
Medalion, Benjamin; Fuks, Avraham; Sharoni, Erez; Stamler, Alon; Snir, Eitan; Vidne, Bernardo; Porat, Eyal
PUB. DATE
December 2008
SOURCE
Surgical Endoscopy;Dec2008, Vol. 22 Issue 12, p2638
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The differences in hand functionality after harvesting the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in an endoscopic technique relative to open technique are unclear. One hundred and sixty-four patients who had CABG and their non dominant hand radial artery was harvested either in an open technique ( n = 92) or in an endoscopic technique ( n = 72) in a period of 9.8 ± 3.5 months after the operation were studied. Surgical technique was surgeon specific. Patients were asked either five questions (endoscopic group), or six questions (open group), to assess how radial artery harvesting affected them. Significantly more patients in the open group experienced significant limitations in their work and regular daily activities (12% versus 0%, p = 0.02), social activities (13% versus 0%, p = 0.005), and experienced significant pain (8% versus 0%, p = 0.04) compared with the endoscopic group. More patients in the open group complained that their arm incision disturb them (24% versus 10%, p = 0.01). Forty-two patients (46%) in the open group would prefer smaller incision. A “limitation score” variable was created from the first four questions to reflect overall functionality. Severe limitation was present in 3% of the open group versus 0% in the endoscopic group ( p = 0.04). Female sex and open harvesting technique were found to be independently associated with higher limitation score. After a mean of 9.8 months after surgery, patients reports good overall upper-limb function. However, more patients in the open technique had significant disabilities and dissatisfaction.
ACCESSION #
35261021

 

Related Articles

  • REVASCULARISATION CHOICES.  // Bandolier;Apr2007, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p4 

    The article discusses a meta-analysis which compared minimally invasive direct coronary bypass with left interal thoracic artery anastomosis with percutaneous transluminal coronary artery stenting as revascularisation procedures for the heart. The procedures were compared in terms of their...

  • Mammary artery harvesting using the Da Vinci Si robotic system. Secchin Canale, Leonardo; Bonatti, Johannes // Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery;jan-mar2014, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p107 

    Internal mammary artery harvesting is an essential part of any coronary artery bypass operation. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft surgery has become reality in many centers as a safe and effective alternative to conventional surgery in selected patients. Internal mammary artery...

  • Reviewer's Commentary Five Year Clinical Follow up of Patients who have Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Wolfenden, Hugh // Heart, Lung & Circulation;Oct2003, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p162 

    Comments on the study titled "Five year clinical follow-up of patients who have off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting". Benefits and advantages of OFCAB; Incidence of stroke after off-pump surgery.

  • Editorial Off-pump coronary artery bypass: Where are we? Gardner, Michael // Heart, Lung & Circulation;Oct2003, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p123 

    Editorial. Discusses developments related to off-pump coronary artery bypass (OFCAB) in Australia. Average number of OFCAB cases undertaken by cardiac surgeons; Introduction of articles in the October 2003 issue of "Heart, Lung and Circulation".

  • Five Year Clinical Follow Up of Patients who have had Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Newman, Mark A.; Alvarez, John M.; Kolybaba, Marlene L. // Heart, Lung & Circulation;Oct2003, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p157 

    Off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) has become a common technique for conducting coronary artery surgery. There has been some concern that the anastomoses might not be conducted as effectively on the beating heart, which could lead to poor long-term results. The aim of the present study was...

  • The Development of Coronary Artery Surgery. Connolly, John // Texas Heart Institute Journal;2002, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p10 

    Presents a personal account regarding the development of coronary artery surgery. Use of Vineberg procedure for the treatment of coronary artery occlusive disease; Comparison of coronary flow in dogs with Vineberg implants and dogs with direct coronary bypass; Information on coronary bypass...

  • Beating-Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Indications, Advantages, and Limitations. Chen-Scarabelli, Carol // Critical Care Nurse;Oct2002, Vol. 22 Issue 5, p44 

    Examines beating-heart coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Risks and benefits of CABG surgery; Potential economic impact of CABG surgery on healthcare costs; Discussion on traditional CABG surgery.

  • Outcome analysis of coronary artery bypass grafting: minimally invasive versus standard techniques. Dickes, M.; Stammers, A.; Pierce, M.; Alonso, A.; Fristoe, L.; Taft, K.; Beck, D.; Jones, C. // Perfusion;1999, Vol. 14 Issue 6, p461 

    Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) procedures are purported to result in improvements in patient management over standard techniques. A comparative study was performed on risk-stratified patients treated with either technique. Following institutional review board...

  • Koronarno premoÅ¡tavanje u tretmanu visoko rizičnih pacijenata. Avdagić, Harun; Mujanović, Emir; Mešanović, Nihad; Sijerčić-Avdagić, Selma; Pirić, Melika // Medicinski Arhiv;2009, Vol. 63 Issue 2, p75 

    Although it is possible to find a number of comparative studies in the world literature discussing the results of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) with and without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), until now such analysis has not been made in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The main aim of this...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics