TITLE

How Did Americans Vote?

PUB. DATE
November 2008
SOURCE
Weekly Reader News - Edition 3;11/21/2008, Vol. 78 Issue 11, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
A quiz about the voting outcome in each U.S. state is presented.
ACCESSION #
35249150

 

Related Articles

  • Using a voting machine.  // World Almanac for Kids;1996, p225 

    Offers information about voting in the United States. How to use a voting machine; A timeline showing who has been eligible to vote in the United States from 1789 through 1971.

  • Portrait of a recount: Doughnuts, lawsuits. Scherer, Ron // Christian Science Monitor;11/15/96, Vol. 88 Issue 246, p4 

    Examines various congressional districts in the United States in which the votes of Congressional candidates have to be recounted. Reasons for the recounting of votes; Situations in which recounting of votes may be necessary; Comments from Bob Grossfeld, a political consultant.

  • What if everyone in the US had to vote? Deutchman, Iva Ellen // Christian Science Monitor;1/22/97, Vol. 89 Issue 39, p19 

    Discusses the practice of voting in the United States versus that of Australia. Features of United States voting patterns; How the Australian system penalizes its members for not voting; Effects the implementation of the Australian model would have in the United States.

  • Altering Voting Times, Fairly.  // Christian Science Monitor;2/27/2001, Vol. 93 Issue 64, p10 

    Editorial. Focuses on a bill sponsored by Representatives Billy Tauzin of Louisiana and Ed Markey of Massachusetts that proposes a 9 p.m. EST closing across the country and criticizes certain aspects of the legislation.

  • Require bids from engineers. Duffy, Arthur P. // ENR: Engineering News-Record;01/05/98, Vol. 240 Issue 1, p59 

    States that in June 1998, California voters will choose whether the politically influenced process for awarding engineers for state work will continue. Requirements of the Competitive Bidding Initiative, a proposed constitutional amendment on the state ballot; Indepth look at the administration...

  • e-voting systems to compete for popularity in local elections.  // Engineer (00137758);4/18/2003, Vol. 291 Issue 7625, p5 

    No abstract available.

  • Tough-activated polls encourage voter turnout.  // Government Product News;Aug97, Vol. 36 Issue 8, p62 

    Presents information on the Elex Electronic Voting Terminal and the Optional Audio-Touch by Computing Devices International. What the systems provide.

  • Your Vote Counts!  // Indiana Business Magazine;Dec2000, Vol. 44 Issue 12, p6 

    Reports that there is a need for better recording and counting of ballots in the U.S. following the confusion that prevailed during the 2000 presidential vote-counting. Details of the voting technology produced by Indianapolis, Indiana-based MicroVote Corp.; Shortcomings of older voting...

  • Justice Department Filing Suits Charging Violations In 2000 Presidential Election.  // Jet;6/10/2002, Vol. 101 Issue 25, p36 

    Reports that the U.S. Justice Dept. is filing lawsuits against three Florida counties and a Tennessee city, charging voter rights violations in the 2000 presidential election.

  • Sophisticated voting in supermajoritarian settings. Volden, Craig // Journal of Politics;Feb98, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p149 

    Examines votes to determine their role in producing sophisticated voting outcomes. Development of a single-dimensional model which predicts sophisticated voting in two cases; Examples of sophisticated voting; How does sophisticated voting situations arises.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics