Canadians say U.S. has it right when it comes to DC plans

June 2008
Employee Benefit News;Jun2008, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p57
The article reports that the U.S. has minimal risk for defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors. According to Ari Kaplan Koskie Minsky at the Canadian Benefits Summit in Toronto, Ontario, in April 2008, plan members in the U.S. are more sure when it comes to their DC plans. It is noted that Canadian pension standards legislation are found in ten statutes that contain provisions for DC plans.


Related Articles

  • A Defined Contribution Model For Healthcare. Bergsman, Steve // Treasury & Risk Management;Oct2000, Vol. 10 Issue 8, p47 

    Discusses how defined contribution healthcare plans will shift the administrative burden from employers to employees in the United States. Xerox Corp.'s adoption of a defined contribution format; Employers and employees' dissatisfaction with care quality. INSETS: What Must Happen First;An...

  • Economic Implications of Defined Contribution Health Plans. Ford, Eric W. // Business Economics;Jan2002, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p38 

    Discusses the economic implications of defined contribution health plans. Trends in employer-based healthcare benefits; Emergence of defined contribution health plans; Effect of defined contribution health plans on employee healthcare consumption patterns.

  • Defined Contribution Benefit Buzz Building. Piontek, Stephen // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;11/27/2000, Vol. 104 Issue 48, p15 

    Focuses on defined contribution options for employee health benefits in the United States. Reasons for the idea behind defined contribution; Benefits of defined contribution; Factors enabling the consideration of these plans.

  • No hue and cry from participants for public sector DC plans. Greene, Andrew // Employee Benefit News;Jul2000, Vol. 14 Issue 8, p43 

    Deals with the move of states and municipalities in the United States of adding defined contribution (DC) plans to their retirement programs. Reasons behind the move; DC plan of Florida; Benefits of DC plans.

  • 25% of corporate DC plans report a drop in their assets. Jacobius, Arleen // Pensions & Investments;1/22/2001, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p21 

    Reports the defined contribution plans of the top employee benefit fund sponsors in the United States for the year 2000. Details of the highest negative growth among pension trusts; Information on several defined contribution plan with lost value; Account of the safe investment areas according...

  • How to apply NICs to employee benefits.  // People Management;2/8/2001, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p46 

    Deals with how to apply 1A national insurance contribution (NIC) to employee benefits in Great Britain. Benefits that are subject to class 1A contributions; Details on P11D reporting of NIC to the Inland Revenue; Categories that are exempted from class 1A NIC liability. INSETS: Know your...

  • SUMMIT IN BRIEF.  // Corporate Adviser;Nov2014, p7 

    The article reports that the master trusts and trust-based arrangements regulations within the defined contribution (DC) code would put increased pressure on these type structures.

  • Defined Contributions Swell With Choice. Thurston, Charles W. // Global Finance;May2000, Vol. 14 Issue 5, p75 

    Looks at the global market for defined contribution (DC) plans. United States (US) market for DC; Reason for the expected growth of DC plans outside the US: Factors contributing to the growth; Percentage of US self-directed portfolios that are invested in equities; Challenge for the Internet.

  • Govt considers DC 'quality thresholds' for auto-enrol. Selby, Tom // Money Marketing;1/31/2013, p24 

    The article reports that the British government is considering whether to introduce quality thresholds for auto-enroll defined contribution (DC) pension schemes.


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics