Victorian Government Approves Dirty 'Clean Coal' Plant

Morris, Louise
September 2008
Chain Reaction;Sep2008, Issue 103, p43
The article announces the approval by the Victorian government of the HRL coal-fired power station proposed for the Latrobe Valley on July 1, 2008. It is being positioned as the first of a new generation of so-called clean coal power stations in the Australia. If built, the power station will burn 2.4 million tonnes of brown coal each year, emitting 2.4-2.7 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually.


Related Articles

  • EPA board to review proposed Navajo coal plant air permit. FONSECA, FELICIA // Native American Times;1/30/2009, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p2 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) appeals board to review the approval of an air permit for a proposed coal-fired power plant on the Navajo Nation in Arizona. It notes that carbon dioxide emissions will not be part of that process. The EPA...

  • Small-Buck Change Yields Big-Bang Gain. Ferrer, Al; Keller, George // Power Engineering;Jul2007, Vol. 111 Issue 7, p44 

    The article focuses on cutting carbon dioxide (CO⊂2) emissions in a cost-effective way. According to the author, improving combustion efficiency or reducing heat rate is an immediate and economical method to reduce emissions. He states that a decrease in boiler instability can benefit...

  • Plant opponents overlook that new technology cuts pollutants.  // Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);2/18/2008, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p24 

    The article comments on the protesters to the proposed coal-fired power plant in Mesquite, Nevada. It notes that this plant would employ 800 construction jobs in the short term and 110 jobs after opening. The protesters are concerned about the carbon dioxide emissions to be generated by the...

  • Making Coal-Fired Electricity Cheap and Clean.  // Trends Magazine;Aug2012, Issue 112, p32 

    The article discusses the plan of making clean and cheap coal-fired electricity. It notes that coal-fired plants are second on the rank when it comes to carbon-dioxide emissions although it is cost-effective and very accessible. It points out that the new technology called high-pressure,...

  • How New Coal Plants Help Achieve Environmental Goals. McIlvaine, Bob // Power Engineering;Mar2009, Vol. 113 Issue 3, p38 

    The article explores the potential of new coal-fired power plants in reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. By any standard, one of the most economically efficient way to achieve greenhouse gas reduction is the replacement of old coal plants. By doing this, the goal of 20% greenhouse gas...

  • Profit-rich Drax increases carbon output.  // Professional Engineering;9/20/2006, Vol. 19 Issue 17, p5 

    The article focuses on issues concerning the increase in carbon dioxide emission by profit-rich coal-fired power station Drax Power Ltd. in North Yorkshire, England. According to a report, the plant produces more carbon dioxide in 2006 as compared with the previous year because it has been...

  • EZ Ramps Up Investment in Coal Plants.  // Coal Age;Oct2007, Vol. 112 Issue 10, p12 

    The article reports on the plans of power producer CEZ to invest more than Kc100 billion to renew and build coal-fired power stations in Czech Republic in six years. It wants to reconstruct up to 10 and build up to three coal-fired units. It also seeks to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 15...

  • Defining "capture ready.".  // TCE: The Chemical Engineer;Aug2007, Issue 794, p6 

    The article reports on the "Capture Ready Study" published by the Energy Technology Conversion subject group of IChemE. It says that the group wants to better define the term capture ready which is used to describe new coal-fired power plants designed with future capture of their carbon dioxide...

  • Modeling Emissions Performance in New Coal Projects. Carrino, Anthony J. // Power Engineering;Apr2007, Vol. 111 Issue 4, p6 

    The article presents an analysis of net cash margin (NCM) risk model of super- and sub-critical technology in new-build coal-fired plant decision-making. The NCM for these technologies include terms that indicate the costs or revenue obtained from sulfur oxides (SOx) and/or carbon dioxide...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics