TITLE

Organizing Attention: Responses of the Bureaucracy to Agenda Disruption

AUTHOR(S)
May, Peter J.; Workman, Samuel; Jones, Blyan D.
PUB. DATE
October 2008
SOURCE
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory;Oct2008, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p517
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Federal agencies are routinely confronted with requests from policymakers that they must address in some manner. These range from routine directives to cut through red tape to exceptional demands to alter policy priorities. We theorize that how attention is organized by public bureaucracies affects their responses. We draw on a variety of scholarship about public bureaucracies to develop a theory about the bureaucratic organization of attention and its consequences. In illustrating these notions, we trace federal agency attention to the threat of terrorism as it gained prominence on the national policy agenda over the 1980s to 1990s and became a prominent issue after the terrorist attacks of 2001. The consequences of the Department of Homeland Security's centralized attention to the terrorism threat suggest a paradox of issue attention. Though concentration of authority at the top of the organization holds the prospect of control over the substance and speed of policymaking, this control is highly circumscribed by the limits of attention faced by all organizations.
ACCESSION #
34725964

 

Related Articles

  • The Intelligence Spam Machine. Becker, Andrew; Schulz, G. W. // Newsweek;9/12/2011, Vol. 158 Issue 11, p8 

    The article discusses problems with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Topics include late and repeated information about threats of terrorism or violence, views about the information from intelligence experts and law enforcement officials such as Louis B. Tucker, former director for the...

  • HOMELAND SECURITY HASN'T MADE US SAFER. APPLEBAUM, ANNE // Foreign Policy;Jan/Feb2011, Issue 184, p57 

    The article argues that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has done little to protect the U.S. against terrorist attacks. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is criticized for wasting air travelers' time with intrusive screening, while most attempts at terrorism on...

  • ITACG INTERAGENCY THREAT ASSESSMENT AND COORDINATION GROUP.  // Sheriff;Sep/Oct2008, Vol. 60 Issue 5, p38 

    The article offers information on the Interagency Threat Assessment and Coordination Group (ITACG). It notes that ITACG is instituted from the Title 6, U.S. Code 210D of the Section 521 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, in which small group from the state...

  • Chemical Facility Security Standards Place New Requirements on Chemical Industry.  // JCT CoatingsTech;Aug2010, Vol. 7 Issue 8, p18 

    The article focuses on new requirements for the chemical industry that are brought by the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) due to the 2001 terrorist attacks in the U.S. It mentions the rules made by the Department of Homeland Security in relation to the enactment of CFATS in...

  • Assessing Security-Risk Tiers Under DHS's CFATS. Roberts, Steven // Chemical Week;10/27/2008, Vol. 170 Issue 33, p39 

    The article reports on efforts by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to notify some 7,000 facilities in late June 2008 regarding the possible high level of security risk posed by the use or storage of certain chemicals under the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) law....

  • Prepping for DHS's Review of Site Security Plans. Roberts, Steven E. // Chemical Week;1/18/2010, Vol. 172 Issue 2, p32 

    This article discusses the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) role in the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) program. It notes that over 2,000 chemical facilities have already been assigned by DHS to one of four final risk-tiers. As part of the program, chemical...

  • Security Summit Debates Future of CFATS. Sissell, Kara // Chemical Week;7/30/2012, Vol. 174 Issue 20, p8 

    The article discusses a summit between officials from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and chemical industries, which covered topics such as Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS), threat identification, and theft prevention. Speakers included DHS officials Jonathan...

  • United we stand. Johnson, Bart R. // Urgent Communications;Oct2011, Vol. 29 Issue 10, p16 

    The article focuses on the important role of fusion centers in the partnership between the U.S. federal government, state, local, tribal and territorial law-enforcement and homeland security. Fusion centers can gather and receive related information and access to suspicious activity reporting....

  • The Importance of SAFETY Act Protections for the Electric Power Industry. Finch, Brian; Eisenstat, Larry // Electric Light & Power;May/Jun2009, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p14 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies (SAFETY) Act of 2002 concerning cyber attacks on U.S.'s energy infrastructure. The SAFETY Act was enacted after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks to assure energy companies that they...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics