Paging Auction Debate Rages

Vaughan, Allyson
August 2000
Wireless Week;08/07/2000, Vol. 6 Issue 32, p20
Trade Publication
Reports that the ruling of the United States Appeals Court in Washington for the Federal Communications Commission auction regulation has stimulated debate over the validity of paging auctions. Actions of the Personal Communications Industry Association; Views on the court ruling; Petitioners in the case.


Related Articles

  • Affirmative-action watch. Williams, S. // Black Enterprise;Sep90, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p20 

    Comments on a recent US Supreme Court ruling that upheld the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) affirmative-action policies. Background of the case; Implications.

  • Off to court. Cooper, Lane F. // Telephony;09/22/97, Vol. 233 Issue 12, p20 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by several United States legislators against the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) after FCC rejected Ameritech Corp.'s application to offer long-distance service in Michigan. Background of the case; Description of the Total Element Long Run Increment Costs.

  • High court rejects request to stop stay. Wayne, Debra // RCR;11/18/96, Vol. 15 Issue 46, p1 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court rejected any further appeal to vacate a stay of certain interconnection and local competition rules adopted by the Federal Communications Commision(FCC), in August 1996. Reference to the court rejecting a petition for such action filed by the...

  • Industry prepares portability argument for court. Weaver, Heather Forsgren // RCR;09/21/98, Vol. 17 Issue 38, p52 

    Reports that the wireless industry is preparing for arguments against the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) before a federal appeals court, regarding claims of improper enactment of rules requiring wireless number portability which should be reversed. Court in which the...

  • Untitled. Jessell, Harry A. // Broadcasting & Cable;5/24/93, Vol. 123 Issue 21, p68 

    Reports on the refusal of United States District Court Judge Royce Lamberth to block the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from enforcing its indecency rules. Arguments that the agency's fining procedure violates broadcaster's First Amendment rights; Disqualification of parties that...

  • Untitled. Jessell, Harry A. // Broadcasting & Cable;5/24/93, Vol. 123 Issue 21, p68 

    Reports on the ruling of United States Court of Federal Claims Judge Robert Hodges that the Portals office complex in Southwest Washington may have been unfairly treated in its bid to win a lease to house the Federal Communications Commission. Complaint against the General Services...

  • Untitled. Jessell, Harry A. // Broadcasting & Cable;5/24/93, Vol. 123 Issue 21, p68 

    Reports on the protest registered by Federal Communications Commissioner Andrew Barrett against the commission's denial of the request for an extension of the effective date of the new cable regulations. Failure to explain the denial; Companies' need for time to assess the impact of the...

  • Settlement: FCC's newest strategy to address indecency? Ballard, Michelle M.; Rivera-Sanchez, Milagros // Communications & the Law;Dec96, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p1 

    Examines the rationale used by the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in settling its cases against Evergreen Media and Infinity Broadcasting, regarding indecent broadcasting over the airwaves. When the cases against both were settled; Analysis of why the FCC departed from...

  • LECs clash over interconnect. Wayne, Debra // RCR;9/02/96, Vol. 15 Issue 35, p1 

    Discusses the conflict between telecommunications corporations, and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on proxy pricing in the United States. Details on proxy pricing; Legal motion filed by GTE Corporation and Southern New England Telephone Company against the FCC's order; Other...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics