Reforming an 'untenable' system
Tags: CAMPAIGN funds; ELECTIONS -- United States; PRACTICAL politics; POLITICAL participation; UNITED States. Supreme Court
Related Articles
- Citizens United's Reshaping of 2012 Election. Roarty, Alex // National Journal;10/29/2011, p7
The article discusses the impact of changes in campaign finance regulations on the midterm election in the U.S. In its Citizens United decision, the Supreme Court has allowed unions and corporations to channel money into elections via their treasuries. The decision resulted to the advent of new...
- Court of last resort for altering fund-raising? Richey, Warren // Christian Science Monitor;11/16/98, Vol. 90 Issue 246, p4
Reports that the United States Supreme Court are considering taking up two cases that could facilitate a rewrite of its landmark decision of 1976 that laid the groundwork for the way politicians raise and spend campaign money. The Cincinnati, Ohio ordinance that limits the amount a city council...
- Are companies people? Kinsley, Michael // New Republic;5/7/90, Vol. 202 Issue 19, p6
Comments on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that states may forbid corporations to spend money in support of political candidates. Argument that corporations are not people; Ruling that corporations enjoy certain economic advantages conferred by the state; Limitation of the political role of...
- Are companies people? Kinsley, Michael // New Republic;5/7/90, Vol. 202 Issue 19, p6
Comments on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that states may forbid corporations to spend money in support of political candidates. Argument that corporations are not people; Ruling that corporations enjoy certain economic advantages conferred by the state; Limitation of the political role of...
- Losing Attitude. Conniff, Ruth // Progressive;Jul2006, Vol. 70 Issue 7, p12
The article presents information related to the upcoming midterm elections in the United States. According to a political report, the Democrats need to pick up fifteen seats to take control of the U.S. House. But if the Democrats obtain a majority in the U.S. Congress in 2006, it would not be a...
- Soft-Money Ban Upheld. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;12/11/2003, Vol. 346 Issue 31779, p1
No abstract available.
- Why Can't Obama Get Campaign Law Straight? von Spakovsky, Hans A. // Human Events;9/6/2010, Vol. 66 Issue 31, p1
The article clarifies the claims by U.S. President Barack Obama regarding the Supreme Court's decision on Citizens United which he said reversed a century of law to open the floodgates, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in U.S. elections. According to the author, Obama's...
- Corporate Mischief. Becker, Joseph D. // Commonweal;6/18/2010, Vol. 137 Issue 12, p8
The article focuses on the illegal use of corporate treasury funds in elections in the U.S. The federal law does not allow the use of such funds for making direct contributions or expenditures in elections but the McCain-Feingold Law of 2002 expanded the prohibition by including public...
- UNANIMOUS DECISION MAKING ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT: Case Stimuli and Judicial Attitudes. Brenner, Saul; Arrington, Theodore S. // Political Behavior;1987, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p75
Although behavioral scholars have devoted much time and energy to attempting to explain decision making on the U.S. Supreme Court, they have virtually ignored the unanimous decision. We investigated the Vinson, Warren, and Burger Courts and discovered that the liberal outcome was more successful...
