TITLE

THE DEBATE ON SELF-PLAGIARISM: INQUISITIONAL SCIENCE OR HIGH STANDARDS OF SCHOLARSHIP?

AUTHOR(S)
Roig, Miguel
PUB. DATE
September 2008
SOURCE
Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies;Sep2008, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p245
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reusing one's previously published work without alerting the reader of its prior publication constitutes self-plagiarism and it is a practice that is strictly forbidden by most scientific and scholarly journals. There are circumstances that may justify the publication of an entire article or of portions of an article that had been previously published in another journal. Guidance on these matters is readily available and specifies the conditions under which secondary publication can take place. However, the mission of most scholarly journals is to publish original research. With some exceptions (e.g., translation into another language), few journals seem willing to grant the right to publish their material elsewhere or exercise the option to publish an article that had been previously published in another periodical. One area of contention for which little guidance is available is the practice of reusing verbatim portions of text from authors' previously published articles. I argue that such a practice should be avoided because it is not consistent with the high standards expected of scholars and scientists.
ACCESSION #
34615012

 

Related Articles

  • Plagiarism and other scientific misconducts. Höffken, K.; Gabbert, H. // Journal of Cancer Research & Clinical Oncology;Mar2009, Vol. 135 Issue 3, p327 

    The article presents examples of scientific misconduct and plagiarism. It states that scientists learned that results of scientific work was published by the same authors in different journals and different order. However, the content of the publications differed slightly by omitting or adding...

  • Academic accused of living on borrowed lines. Abbott, Alison; Cyranoski, David; Feresin, Emiliano; Lenotti, Carina // Nature;8/9/2007, Vol. 448 Issue 7154, p632 

    The article focuses on the concern of the academic community on the extent of plagiarism in academic journals following the discovery of an alleged serial plagiarism committed by a German economist. According to the author, several works of Hans Werner Gottinger, an economist specializing in...

  • Guidelines for article publishing. Pocock, Lesley // Middle East Journal of Nursing;Nov2014, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p32 

    With papers from the journals listed above, now in several major databases and with the application of unique DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) to all individual articles, we are publishing the following advice and revision of guidelines for our authors. This advice reflects the current status...

  • Plagiarism, a scourge. Rao, K. R. // Current Science (00113891);3/10/2008, Vol. 94 Issue 5, p581 

    Manuscripts, based on copying from other sources, without 'proper' crediting/referencing to original sources, are often encountered by editors/publishers of books and journals. This bane, broadly referred to as 'plagiarizing', is found to be prevalent to quite an extent. In this article, after...

  • Ethical publishing: the innocent author's guide to avoiding misconduct. Wager, Elizabeth // Menopause International;Sep2007, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p98 

    Publication misconduct includes a range of unethical behaviours, such as plagiarism, breach of confidence and inappropriate authorship. The most egregious cases are easy to recognize and widely condemned, but the gradient between normal and unethical behaviour is often a gradual one. Clinicians...

  • Recent instances of author misconduct in Pramana. Godbole, Rohini M. // Pramana: Journal of Physics;May2008, Vol. 70 Issue 5, p761 

    The article focuses on the instances of author misconduct in the journal "Pramana." It highlights the issue of plagiarism to some of the scientific information that have been published within the journal. It outlines the efforts of the periodical's Editorial Board members to review the...

  • Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals. Bosch, Xavier; Hernández, Cristina; Pericas, Juan M.; Doti, Pamela; Marušić, Ana // PLoS ONE;Dec2012, Vol. 7 Issue 12, p1 

    Background: It is not clear which research misconduct policies are adopted by biomedical journals. This study assessed the prevalence and content policies of the most influential biomedical journals on misconduct and procedures for handling and responding to allegations of misconduct. Methods:...

  • Stampede on page one. Johnson, Flora // Columbia Journalism Review;Jan/Feb1980, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p8 

    This article reports on the story published by the Chicago Tribune and the SunTimes about the Indiana trial involving a Ford Pinto car explosion incident. Chicago journalism with its penchant for scoops has long entranced newspapermen with its tangy blend of derring-do and self-promotion. Privy...

  • Defining and responding to plagiarism. Wager, Elizabeth // Learned Publishing;Jan2014, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p33 

    A clear definition of plagiarism and the ability to classify it into more or less serious forms would help editors and publishers to devise policies to handle this problem. Text-matching software is a useful tool for measuring the extent of text copying but it cannot detect plagiarized tables or...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics