Life after LaRue may not be as bad as anticipated

September 2008
Employee Benefit News;Sep2008, Vol. 22 Issue 12, p84
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, which allows 401(k) participants to sue fiduciaries. Contrary to the prior case law, which states that a complaint must be brought on behalf of the plan as a whole, the ruling indicated that this applied to individual participants.


Related Articles

  • Fiduciary Liability Landscape Uncertain After Supreme Court Decision In LaRue. Gusman, Phil // National Underwriter / P&C;6/9/2008, Vol. 112 Issue 22, p16 

    The article reports on the impact of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision involving ERISA litigation. The Supreme Court decision in LaRue vs. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates clears the way for individuals to sue their 401(k) providers for money damages under ERISA on behalf of themselves rather...

  • A Constant State of Exhaustion? LaRue v. DeWolff Revisited.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q3, Special section p1 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case LaRue versus Dewolff, Boberg & Associates Inc. It expresses opinion on the decision of the Court in the case. It provides a short history on the claims of the plaintiff, which started because he believed that his 401(k) plan account had been...

  • The Supreme Court Gives "Green Light" to Individual 401(k) Lawsuits. Nolumbic, Lars C.; Wilder, Will // Benefits Quarterly;2008 Third Quarter, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p7 

    In LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc. et al., the U.S. Supreme Court recently opened the door for 401(k) plan participants to sue plan fiduciaries to recover losses to their individual accounts. The decision resolved a split in the circuit courts of appeals and held that the Employee...

  • Participant Rights Expand Under Defined Contribution Plans. McGouuan Jr., John J. // Labor & Employment Law;Spring2008, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p5 

    The article presents information related to increased participant rights under defined contribution plans. In LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Assocs. Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held that individuals covered by 401(k) and similar plans may obtain monetary relief if their plan account suffered a loss...

  • Death Knell for Dominance In 401(k)s, Edelman Says. Perrone, Brooke // Money Management Executive;6/23/20008, Vol. 16 Issue 25, p4 

    The article discusses a court case "LaRue v. DeWolff," wherein James LaRue sued DeWolff Boberg & Associates Inc., provider of his 401(k) pension plan, for breach of fiduciary duties in the U.S. LaRue claims that the firm has ignored his request to shift to more stable investments leading to the...

  • Strategies for Fiduciary Best Practices After LaRue and Glenn.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q4, Special section p1 

    The article comments on the decisions issued by the U.S. Supreme Court in the cases Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, and LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates Inc. Practitioners claimed that the Court's decisions support the rights of plan participants to make successful actions against...

  • High court ruling opens 401(k) can of worms. Griffith, Dodd S.; Van Buskirk, Laurel // New Hampshire Business Review;3/28/2008, Vol. 30 Issue 7, p24 

    The article focuses on the ruling in the case LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates Inc. in the U.S. The authors mention that the Supreme Court held that an employee could sue his employer for investment losses that the employee claimed were caused by the employer's failure to make requested...

  • Suing for Retirement?  // Products Finishing;Sep2008, Vol. 72 Issue 12, p68 

    The article elaborates the court decision regarding the lawsuit LaRue vs. DeWolff due to breach of fiduciary duty in the U.S. It notes that LaRue sued his former employer, DeWolff, because of breach of fiduciary duty due to his interest in the 401 (k) plan, wherein his retirement was depleted by...

  • LaRue In The Lower Courts. Gusman, Phil // National Underwriter / P&C;6/9/2008, Vol. 112 Issue 22, p16 

    The article discusses the details of the U.S. Supreme Court case LaRue vs. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates. The author mentions that before the case ended up in the Supreme Court, lower courts dealt with questions about which sections of ERISA would allow James LaRue to bring his case for an...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics