EXPANDING RIGHTS UNDER STATE CONSTITUTIONS: A QUANTITATIVE APPRAISAL
- "THIS NEW AND BEAUTIFUL ORGANISM": THE EVOLUTION OF AMERICAN FEDERALISM IN THREE STATE SUPREME COURTS. Ranney, Joseph A. // Marquette Law Review;Winter2003, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p253
Examines the evolution of American federalism in Supreme Courts in Wisconsin, Georgia and Kentucky. Effect of war and Reconstruction on federalist sentiment; State supreme courts and federalism during the antebellum era.
- Italy 'Disappointed' at India's Delay on Marine Trial. HORNBY, CATHERINE // News India Times;12/21/2012, Vol. 43 Issue 51, p12
The article presents information on the disappointment showed by the government of Italy on the delay in the decision related to two Italian marines by the Indian Supreme Court.
- DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND U.S. FEDERAL SYSTEMS.... Farber, Daniel // Canada-United States Law Journal;2001, Vol. 27, p11
Focuses on the impact of federalism on the implementation of border agreements. Increase in authority of federal government in the area of civil liberties and civil rights; Changes in the constitutional doctrine; Collision between the government and the Supreme Court.
- Power to the State. // ABA Journal;Jan2003, Vol. 89 Issue 1, p38
Presents a roundtable discussion about federalism and the role of U.S. courts in protecting the rights of the states. Cases mentioned in the discussion; Commerce clause of the Constitution. INSET: THE CASES.
- THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AS QUASI-INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL: RECLAIMING THE COURT'S ORIGINAL AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OVER TREATY-BASED SUITS BY FOREIGN STATES AGAINST STATES. Lee, Thomas H. // Columbia Law Review;Nov2004, Vol. 104 Issue 7, p1765
In this Article, Professor Lee argues that the Constitution vests in the Supreme Court original and exclusive jurisdiction over suits brought by foreign states against States alleging violations of treaties of the United States The basis for nonimmunity is a peacekeeping theory of ratification...
- STRUCTURE OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM. // Congressional Digest;May58, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p132
No abstract available.
- Court upholds checkoff. // Tire Business;6/6/2005, Vol. 23 Issue 5, p3
This article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court which has ruled that the beef industry has the right to charge ranchers $1 per head of cattle to fund the "Beef: It's What's for Dinner" public information checkoff program. Since the federal government runs the program, the majority ruled, it is...
- Is THERE A DORMANT EXTRATERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE?: COMMERCE CLAUSE LIMITS ON STATE ANTITRUST LAWS. Ruttinger, Michael J. // Michigan Law Review;Dec2007, Vol. 106 Issue 3, p545
State antitrust laws ordinarily supplement federal law by providing a cause of action for anticompetitive activity that occurs in the state. Some states, however, have construed their antitrust regimes to reach conduct that occurs outside the state's boundaries. Such regulation raises...
- BOLLING ALONE. Primus, Richard A. // Columbia Law Review;May2004, Vol. 104 Issue 4, p975
Under the doctrine of reverse incorporation, generally identified with the Supreme Court's decision in Bolling v. Sharpe, equal protection binds the federal government even though the Equal Protection Clause by its terms is addressed only to states. Since Bolling, however, the courts have almost...