Aiming for Fair And Accurate

Darras, Frank N.
September 2008
Best's Review;Sep2008, Vol. 109 Issue 5, p99
Trade Publication
The article addresses the importance of a fair and accurate judicial review on conflict of interest. It discusses the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. vs. Glenn case that the conflict of interest should be considered in determining whether the administrator has abused its discretion in denying the claim. Moreover, the Court's decision indicated that the insurer is acting under a conflict of interest.


Related Articles

  • Conning the IADC Newsletters. Bondurant, Elizabeth J. // Defense Counsel Journal;Jan2010, Vol. 77 Issue 1, p120 

    The article focuses on the legal case of Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Glenn filed at the U.S. Supreme Court. The court has applied appropriate standard of review for benefit determination cases and resolution to the administration's conflict of interest. The decision of the court favored...

  • Supreme Court Complicates Judicial Review of "Dual-Role" Discretionary Benefit Decisions.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to preserve the legal standard governing how courts review the discretionary claims denials of insurance companies. It is stated that the decision will complicate the claims determination process of a large number of plans....

  • High court decision to affect disability plans. Hofmann, Mark A. // Business Insurance;4/28/2008, Vol. 42 Issue 17, p3 

    The article discusses issues on the plan of the U.S. Supreme Court whether benefit plan administrators that both determine benefits and pay them out of their own funds operate under a conflict of interest. The case concerned, Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. vs. Wanda Glenn, raises the question...

  • High Court Asks Administration To Discuss Disability Case. Bell, Allison // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;4/23/2007, Vol. 111 Issue 16, p7 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has asked U.S. solicitor generals to explain their positions on the long-term disability insurance discretionary clause involving insurance contract case between insurer MetLife Inc. and claimant Wanda Glenn. The MetLife case depends on courts...

  • Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

  • U.S. Supreme Court rules on conflict of interest in benefit claims.  // Employee Benefit News Canada in Brief;7/29/2008, p6 

    The article advises companies and administrators of employee benefit plans in the U.S. to take note of a new U.S. Supreme Court case addressing conflicts of interest arising where insurance companies both adjudicate and pay claims.

  • Doctor's Amputation Too Painless. Blum, Andrew // Forensic Panel Letter;1/1/2001, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p6 

    On January 16, 1994, David Tomchik, a licensed podiatrist, amputated his thumb while operating a band saw at his home. Tomchik filed claims with his disability insurers, but the insurance company was skeptical. Insurance company MetLife Inc. denied his claim on the grounds that Tomchik...

  • Met Settles Sales Practices Class Lawsuits. Bell, Allison // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;8/23/99, Vol. 103 Issue 34, p1 

    Focuses on the agreement of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to settle litigation over its sale practices with its clients. Background of the litigation; Claims of the plaintiffs against Metropolitan; Package and procedure of the settlement.

  • Glenn ruling may spur more lawsuits, increase costs. O'Rourke, Lawrence M. // Employee Benefit News;4/1/2009, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p12 

    The article focuses on the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. versus Glenn, which rules a conflict of interest if one plan administrator makes decisions on claims and pays them. It is stated that employers may need to adjust relationships with insurers to be certain...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics