Alexander, Colonel Joseph H.
September 2008
Military History;Sep/Oct2008, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p28
The author explores the potential and perils of amphibious warfare. The author reflects on the case of the amphibious attack of Inchon, Korea, by the U.S. forces in 1950. He indicates the reasons for the success of the operation. He also notes that the U.S. Marines acknowledged the scale of the disaster but disagreed that amphibious operations were obsolete.


Related Articles

  • INCHON.  // America in the Korean War;1998, p37 

    Discusses the invasion plans of U.S. General Douglas MacArthur on the Inchon Harbor in South Korea during the war against North Korea in 1950. Reason for choosing Inchon for the invasion; Pre-invasion attacks at Wolmi-do by the U.S. and British ships and war planes; Beach landings of the U.S....

  • Operation Chromite Target: INCHON. Marolda, Edward J. // Naval History;Oct2010, Vol. 24 Issue 5, p38 

    The article presents an in-depth profile of the invasion of Inchon, Korea in September 1950. Introductory context is offered describing the United Nations' military conditions before and leading up to the attack. The logistics and execution of the amphibious invasion, code named Operation...

  • The Road to SEOUL. SLOAN, BILL // MHQ: Quarterly Journal of Military History;Winter2010, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p62 

    The article discusses the amphibious assault and invasion of Inchon and capture of Seoul, Korea by the U.S. military under the command of general Douglas MacArthur. The author reflects on North Korean resistance and the heroic actions of U.S. corporal Russell "Moose" House. Other topics include...

  • The Battle of Pusan Perimeter & the Inch'on Invasion. Schaff, Marta // Battle of Pusan Perimeter & the Inch'on Invasion;8/1/2017, p1 

    Focuses on the Battle of Pusan Perimeter and the Inch'on Invasion, one of the earliest engagements of the Korean War. Efforts of the first American forces sent to Korea to slow the advance of the North Korean army; Successful defense of the Pusan Perimeter against several attacks despite the...

  • Negotiated Joint Command Relationships. Chisholm, Donald // Naval War College Review;Spring2000, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p65 

    Examines the joint command relationships of the United States Armed Forces during the Korean War amphibious operations. Role of amphibious doctrine in establishing joint command relationships; Processes of negotiation and bargaining before and during the operations; Structure and evolution of...

  • Amphib Redux. Cutler, Thomas J. // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Dec2011, Vol. 137 Issue 12, p92 

    The article reports that a major turning point in the Korean War occurred when General Douglas MacArthur ordered an amphibious landing at Inchon, which caught the North Koreans completely off guard and sent them in a headlong retreat. The credit for the success of this operation belongs to...

  • Amphibious Ops a Dual-Use Tool for U.S. Policy Kit Farley, Robert // World Politics Review (19446284);2/15/2012, p1 

    The article reports on the military operation exercise, called Bold Alligator, conducted by the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps. The exercise aimed at enhancing the skills of Marines in amphibious operations and testing the capabilities of the USS Enterprise supercarrier, amphibious assault vessels...

  • PROJECTING POWER IN GATOR OPERATIONS. Desgrosseilliers, Todd S.; Bowers, William J.; Wortman, Christian F. // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Nov2012, Vol. 138 Issue 11, p34 

    The article discusses on the need for the U.S. Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) to enhance its capabilities for operational edge. To keep pace with emerging threats, the team is chalking out important advances in projecting power through the full range of amphibious and crisis-response...

  • Forcible Entry Is a Strategic Necessity. Hoffman, Frank G. // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Nov2004, Vol. 130 Issue 11, p2 

    This article reports that one crucial military capability under scrutiny in the Pentagon is seabased joint forcible entry operations. Civilian policy makers cringe at the investment stream for amphibious and prepositioning ships, mine clearing systems, naval surface fires, and the Marine Corps'...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics