TITLE

Litigation abounds as closings slow

AUTHOR(S)
Smith, Hubbie
PUB. DATE
August 2008
SOURCE
Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);8/4/2008, Vol. 25 Issue 31, pP14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the increase in litigation between condominium buyers and sellers in Las Vegas, Nevada as closings of such property slows in 2007 and in 2008. It explains the types of disputes involve in the litigation. Attorney Greg Weston said that developers have reasons for not complying with the terms of their own contracts despite the requirement of state and federal laws to give buyers a partial refund of their deposit if they decides not to close.
ACCESSION #
34162049

 

Related Articles

  • Cases in Brief.  // Appraisal Journal;Jul99, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p316 

    Focuses on the case of the Mayhew family versus the Town of Sunnyvale in Texas regarding land development. Details on the case; Why the town of Sunnyvale rejected the Mayhews' planned development proposal; Decision of the Supreme Court on the case.

  • New Battle of Princeton. P., Shankar // njbiz;4/21/2003, Vol. 16 Issue 16, p11 

    Reports on a conflict in Princeton, New Jersey regarding a downtown redevelopment project. Opposition received by the redevelopment project from a group of residents and merchants called the Concerned Citizens of Princeton; Information on the lawsuit filed by the Concerned Citizens of Princeton...

  • Wandsworth London Borough Council v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another. Dobson, Sally // EG: Estates Gazette;3/1/2003, Issue 309, p196 

    Presents a summary of the case Wadsworth London Borough Council versus Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government. Details of the case; Decision on the case.

  • Romer v Haringey London Borough Council and others.  // EG: Estates Gazette;12/16/2006, Issue 650, p84 

    The article presents information on the Romer versus Haringey London Borough Council and others case in Great Britain. On appeal against a notice, the claimant argued that a real estate development had become immune from enforcement action by virtue of section 171B 2 of the Town and Country...

  • Land Developers Sued For Damage To Trees.  // National Wildlife (World Edition);Dec87/Jan88, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p32 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by property owners against land developers for damages to trees. Payment of an out-of-court settlement by a Minnesota property developer; Extent of forest damage; Rules and policies for preserving trees; Indications for the development of environmental laws and...

  • Developers build cases over condo copyright. Smith, Jennette // Crain's Detroit Business;10/7/2002, Vol. 18 Issue 40, p1 

    Reports the condominium copyright dispute of residential real estate owners in Detroit, Michigan. Approximation on the damages and legal fees of the lawsuit; Denial of the court on the request of homebuilder Centex Homes for summary judgment on the cases; Issues in the cases.

  • Forest Service employees and activist face racketeering charges. Weiser, Matt // High Country News;3/7/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p4 

    Focuses on the legal conflict between Sandy Steers, executive director of the Friends of Fawnskin, with several forest concern individuals and Marina Point Development Associates concerning a condominium development in Big Bear Lake, California. Allegation of the developers against Robin...

  • Holmes Harbor Developer Pleads Guilty to Criminal Charges. Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;8/2/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31938, p5 

    Reports on the entry of a guilty plea by real estate developer Terry Martin on charges of bond fraud related to the Holmes Harbor Sewer District in Seattle, Washington. Admission of Martin of his involvement in conspiracy,securities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering; Other defendants...

  • Regulatory Takings Law Strikes Again. Kablack, Mark A. // Massbuilder;2007 1st Quarter, p22 

    The article focuses on the decision released by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court that the plaintiff in the case Giovanella versus Town of Ashland Conservation Commission failed to meet his burden of establishing how he would sufficiently protect the wetlands. It provides an overview of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics