TITLE

Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening

AUTHOR(S)
J. J. Y. Sung; J. Y. W. LAu; G. P. Young; Y. Sano; H. M. Chiu; J. S. Byeon; K. G. Yeah; K. L. Goh; J. Sollano; A. Rerknimitr; I. Matsuda; K. C. Wu; S. Ng; S. Y. Leung; G. Makharia; V. H. Chong; K. Y. Ho; D. Brooks; D. A. Lieberman; F. K. L. Chan
PUB. DATE
August 2008
SOURCE
Gut;Aug2008, Vol. 57 Issue 8, p1166
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is rapidly increasing in Asia, but screening guidelines are lacking. Through reviewing the literature and regional data, and using the modified Delphi process, the Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer and international experts launch consensus recommendations aiming to improve the awareness of healthcare providers of the changing epidemiology and screening tests available. The incidence, anatomical distribution and mortality of CRC among Asian populations are not different compared with Western countries. There is a trend of proximal migration of colonic polyps. Flat or depressed lesions are not uncommon. Screening for CRC should be started at the age of 50 years. Male gender, smoking, obesity and family history are risk factors for colorectal neoplasia. Faecal occult blood test (FOBT, guaiac-based and immunochemical tests), flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy are recommended for CRC screening. Double-contrast barium enema and CT colonography are not preferred. In resource-limited countries, FOBT is the first choice for CRC screening. Polyps 5-9 mm in diameter should be removed endoscopically and, following a negative colonoscopy, a repeat examination should be performed in 10 years. Screening for CRC should be a national health priority in most Asian countries. Studies on barriers to CRC screening, education for the public and engagement of primary care physicians should be undertaken. There is no consensus on whether nurses should be trained to perform endoscopic procedures for screening of colorectal neoplasia.
ACCESSION #
34153237

 

Related Articles

  • Factors That Predict Incomplete Colonoscopy: Thinner Is Not Always Better. Anderson, Joseph C.; Gonzalez, Jennifer D.; Messina, Catherine R.; Pollack, Bonnie J. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Oct2000, Vol. 95 Issue 10, p2784 

    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether anatomic factors such as body mass index (BMI) impacts the success rate of cecal intubation during colonoscopy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cecal intubation rate of 2000 colonoscopies performed at our institution from March...

  • THE TRUTH ABOUT colon cancer.  // Massage Magazine;Dec2007, Issue 139, p100 

    The article provides information on the common myths and misconceptions regarding colorectal cancer presented by experts from the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center. It affects both men and women in all races. According to medical records, 50% of people diagnosed with it have no...

  • Colon Cancer Predictors.  // Environmental Nutrition;Nov2007, Vol. 30 Issue 11, p3 

    The article focuses on a study that aims to identify a suspected link between obesity and colon cancer. During the study, Swedish researchers measured Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio on their subjects. All three measures were strong predictors of colon cancer...

  • Association of Large Serrated Polyps With Synchronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia. Dan Li; Jin, Chengsh; McCulloch, Charles; Kakar, Sanjay; Berger, Barry M.; Imperiale, Thomas F.; Terdiman, Jonathan P. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Mar2009, Vol. 104 Issue 3, p695 

    OBJECTIVES:Serrated polyps of the colorectum are a histologically and genetically heterogeneous group of lesions, which include classic hyperplasic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs), and traditional serrated adenomas. Accumulating evidence suggests that they may have different malignancy...

  • Editorial: Interval Cancers: Learning from the Past as We Build for the Future. Dominitz, Jason A; Robertson, Douglas J // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Aug2013, Vol. 108 Issue 8, p1341 

    While colonoscopy is the gold standard for the evaluation of the colon, research on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers has increased our awareness of its limitations. In this issue of the Journal, Erichsen et al. provide evidence to suggest that post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers are most...

  • Does geography influence the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer? A population-based analysis. Helewa, Ramzi M.; Turner, Donna; Wirtzfeld, Debrah; Park, Jason; Hochman, David; Czaykowski, Piotr; Singh, Harminder; Shu, Emma; Lin Xue; McKay, Andrew // World Journal of Surgical Oncology;2013, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: The Canadian province of Manitoba covers a large geographical area but only has one major urban center, Winnipeg. We sought to determine if regional differences existed in the quality of colorectal cancer care in a publicly funded health care system. Methods: This was a...

  • Virtual colonoscopy aimed to improve patient reluctance.  // Hudson Valley Business Journal;11/15/2004, Vol. 15 Issue 23, p23 

    The article informs that Colon cancer is the second deadliest cancer in the United States. The thought of being screened for colon cancer does bring reluctance but it is important for adults 50 years and older to get screened for colon cancer. CT Virtual Colonoscopy is seen as an alternative to...

  • Methylation of NEUROG1 in Serum Is a Sensitive Marker for the Detection of Early Colorectal Cancer. Herbst, Andreas; Rahmig, Konstanze; Stieber, Petra; Philipp, Alexander; Jung, Andreas; Ofner, Andrea; Crispin, Alexander; Neumann, Jens; Lamerz, Rolf; Kolligs, Frank T // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Jun2011, Vol. 106 Issue 6, p1110 

    OBJECTIVES:Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and a major cause of cancer-related deaths. Early detection of colonic lesions can reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy is the screening test for colorectal cancer with the highest efficacy, but its...

  • For Cancer Screening, There's No Substitute for Colonoscopy.  // Running & FitNews;Sep/Oct2007, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p6 

    The article focuses on the colonoscopy procedure and its benefits for detecting cancer. The early detection procedure has proven to reduce colon cancer related deaths by sixty percent. Details related to the colonoscopy state that it is not painful, it requires a 24 hour fast and flushing of the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics