Results and Lessons Learned from a United States Hip Resurfacing Investigational Device Exemption Trial

Stulberg, Bernard N.; Trier, Kathy K.; Naughton, Marybeth; Zadzilka, Jayson D.
August 2008
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Aug2008 Supplement 3, Vol. 90-A, p21
Academic Journal
Background: Improvements in metal-on-metal bearings have made hybrid hip surface replacement a potential alternative for the young active patient with end-stage hip disease. Possible advantages include greater hip joint stability, bone preservation, and decreased osteolysis. In this study, we compared the clinical and radiographic results of a new resurfacing device with those in a historical group of standard total hip arthroplasties. Methods: In 2001, the Cormet 2000 Hip Resurfacing Investigational Device Exemption study was initiated at twelve centers. A total of 337 patients treated with unilateral hip surface replacement with the Cormet device were enrolled in that study. These patients were compared with 266 patients in a previous study who had undergone unilateral total hip arthroplasty with ceramic bearing surfaces. Clinical and radiographic results were compared at similar time intervals. A newly recommended performance standard, the composite clinical success score, was used to assess non-inferiority of the hip resurfacing compared with the total hip arthroplasty used in the historical comparison population. Results: At the time of follow-up, at a minimum of two years, the Harris hip scores were comparable between the resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty groups. Statistical evaluation of the composite clinical success scores confirmed the non-inferiority hypothesis. Revision was required in twenty-four patients in the resurfacing group and five patients in the total hip arthroplasty group. The most common cause of revision following resurfacing was failure of the femoral component (fracture of the femoral neck or loosening of the femoral component). Conclusions: Careful review of this study population revealed several important criteria for successful introduction of this resurfacing device into the United States. These include careful patient selection based on clinical and radiographic parameters and attention to various surgical details of implantation. These findings can be used to focus the training process for surgeons who wish to add implantation of this device to their surgical armamentarium. Such efforts should help to ensure safe and effective introduction of this new technology.


Related Articles

  • PERSPECTIVE. McDonald Jr., John E. // Orthopedics Today;Jul2011, Vol. 31 Issue 7, p50 

    The author presents his views on J. S. Badylak's study on the effect of iatrogenic labral punctures on clinical results of hip arthroscopy.

  • Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Santaguida, Pasqualina L.; Hawker, Gillian A.; Hudak, Pamela L.; Glazier, Richard; Mahomed, Nizar N.; Kreder, Hans J.; Coyte, Peter C.; Wright, James G. // Canadian Journal of Surgery;Dec2008, Vol. 51 Issue 6, p428 

    The article reports on the results of research which was conducted in an effort to address how patient characteristics influence the outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. researchers found that while younger age and male sex increased the risk of revision...

  • Use of the harmonic system in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, comparative, observational study. Tomáš, Tomáš; Janíček, Pavel; Nachtnebl, Luboš; Ondrůšek, ŠtĘpán; Kunovský, Radek // Hip International;Jul-Sep2010, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p314 

    We compared technical issues, postoperative outcomes and surgical complications of total hip arthroplasty when using the harmonic scalpel (HS) when compared with conventional techniques (CT) in a prospective, comparative observational study. Thirty patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were...

  • Relationship between self-reported and performance-based tests in a hip and knee joint replacement population. Gandhi, Rajiv; Tsvetkov, Dmitry; Davey, J. Roderick; Syed, Khalid A.; Mahomed, Nizar N. // Clinical Rheumatology;Mar2009, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p253 

    Our objectives were: (1) to assess the relationship between self-reported measures (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36)) and a performance-based timed-up-and-go (TUG) test in a hip and knee joint replacement...

  • Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Marino, Joseph; Russo, Joseph; Kenny, Maureen; Herenstein, Robert; Livote, Elayne; Chelly, Jacques E. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Jan2009, Vol. 91-A Issue 1, p29 

    Background: Continuous femoral or lumbar plexus blocks have been demonstrated to provide effective postoperative analgesia of the lower extremity following total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare these two techniques when used with intravenous patient-controlled...

  • Slower Recovery After Two-Incision Than Mini-Posterior-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Pagnano, Mark W.; Trousdale, Robert T.; Meneghini, R. Michael; Hanssen, Arlen D. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Mar2009 Supplement, Vol. 91-A, p50 

    BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that the two-incision total hip arthroplasty technique provides quicker recovery than other methods do. To date, however, there have been no studies that have directly compared the two-incision technique with another method in similar groups of patients managed...

  • Single Mini-Incision Has Some Perioperative Advantages Over Standard-Incision Total Hip Replacement. de Verteuil, R.; Imamura, M.; Zhu, S.; Glazener, C.; Fraser, C.; Munro, N.; Hutchison, J.; Grant, A.; Coyle, D.; Coyle, K.; Vale, L.; Bozic, Kevin // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;May2009, Vol. 91-A Issue 5, p1279 

    The article reports on the results of research which was conducted in an effort to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimal-incision total hip replacement (THR) compared with standard total hip replacement. Researchers examined several medical databases. They found that when...

  • Posterior Capsular Repair Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Modified Technique. Osmani, Omar; Malkani, Arthur; Harwin, Steven F. // Orthopedics;Jun2004, Vol. 27 Issue 6, p553 

    The article presents a modified technique of exposing and repairing the posterior structure during total hip arthroplasty. Studies have demonstrated the merits of posterior capsular repair with respect to decreasing the incidence of dislocation. The technique offers excellent fixation of the hip...

  • Minimalinvasive Hüftendoprothetik - nur Trend oder schon Standard? Kappe, T.; Bieger, R.; Wernerus, D.; Reichel, H. // Der Orthopäde;Sep2011, Vol. 40 Issue 9, p774 

    Minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty are being used worldwide and continue to grow in popularity. Despite early reports of catastrophic failures, both the number of scientific publications as well as the number of orthopaedic surgeons practicing minimally invasive techniques...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics