TITLE

Collaborating to Compete

AUTHOR(S)
Amaldoss, Wilfred; Meyer, Robert J.; Raju, Jagmohan S.; Rapoport, Amnon
PUB. DATE
March 2000
SOURCE
Marketing Science;Spring2000, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p105
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In collaborating to compete, firms forge different types of strategic alliances: same-function alliances, parallel development of new products, and cross-functional alliances. A major challenge in the management of these alliances is how to control the resource commitment of partners to the collaboration. In this research we examine both theoretically and experimentally how the type of an alliance and the prescribed profit-sharing arrangement affect the resource commitments of partners. We model the interaction within an alliance as a noncooperative variable-sum game, in which each firm invests part of its resources to increase the utility of a new product offering. Different types of alliances are modeled by varying how the resources committed by partners in an alliance determine the utility of the jointly- developed new product. We then model the interalliance competition by nesting two independent intra-alliance games in a supergame in which the groups compete for a market. The partners of the winning alliance share the profits in one of two ways: equally or proportionally to their investments. The Nash equilibrium solutions for the resulting games are examined. In the case of same-function alliances, when the market is large the predicted investment patterns under both profit-sharing rules are comparable. Partners developing new products in parallel, unlike the partners in a same-function alliance, commit fewer resources to their alliance. Further, the profit-sharing arrangement matters in such alliances-partners commit more resources when profits are shared proportionally rather than equally. We test the predictions of the model in two laboratory experiments. We find that the aggregate behavior of the subjects is accounted for remarkably well by the equilibrium solution. As predicted, profit-sharing arrangement did not affect the investment pattern of subjects in same-function alliances when they were in the high-reward condition. Subjects developing products in parallel invested less than subjects in same-function alliance, irrespective of the reward condition. We notice that theory seems to underpredict investments in low-reward conditions. A plausible explanation for this departure from the normative benchmark is that subjects in the low-reward condition were influenced by altruistic regard for their partners. These experiments also clarify the support for the mixed strategy equilibrium: aggregate behavior conforms to the equilibrium solution, though the behavior of individual subjects varies substantially from the norm. Individual-level analysis suggests that subjects employ mixed strategies, but not as fully as the theory demands. This inertia in choice of strategies is consistent with learning trends observed in the investment pattern. A new analysis of Robertson and Gatignon's (1998) field survey data on the conduct of corporate partners in technology alliances is also consistent with our model of same-function alliances. We extend the model to consider asymmetric distribution of endowments among partners in a same-function alliance. Then we examine the implication of extending the strategy space to include more levels of investment. Finally, we out-line an extension of the model to consider cross-functional alliances.
ACCESSION #
3367955

 

Related Articles

  • IMPORTANCE OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCES IN COMPANY'S ACTIVITY. Išoraitė, Margarita // Intellectual Economics;Apr2009, Vol. 1 Issue 5, p40 

    Strategic alliance is an agreement between two or more organizations to cooperate in a specific business activity, so that each benefits from the strengths of the other, and gains competitive advantage. The formation of strategic alliances has been seen as a response to globalization and...

  • Organizing successful co-marketing alliances. Bucklin, Louis P.; Sengupta, Sanjit // Journal of Marketing;Apr93, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p32 

    Co-marketing alliances between firms afford fresh opportunity for strategic advantage. Data from 98 alliances show that gains in effectiveness can be obtained by reducing power and managerial imbalances. Careful project selection and better matching of potential partners also help to enhance...

  • Strategic Alliances in the Triad: An Exploratory Study. Terpstra, Vern; Simonin, Bernard L. // Journal of International Marketing;1993, Vol. 1 Issue 1, p4 

    ABSTRACT The Triad nations--Japan, North America, and Western Europe--have emerged in recent decades. To cope with the growing international competition between these areas, firms based in these countries have formed strategic alliances, frequently with partners from another member of the...

  • Strategic alliances vital in global marketing. Gross, Thomas; Neuman, John // Marketing News;6/19/89, Vol. 23 Issue 13, p1 

    The article discusses the importance of strategic alliances in global marketing. The authors claim that strategic alliances are increasingly essential to marketing, corporate success and survival in the global economy. They said that according to a report from "Fortune," U.S. corporations have...

  • FirstBank aims to become major force in credit cards. Ramos, Luis A. // Caribbean Business;1/22/2004, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p2 

    Reports on the long-term strategic marketing alliance signed between U.S.-based companies FirstBank Corp. and MBNA Corp. Purpose of the partnership: Terms of the partnership; Significance of the partnership on both companies.

  • Building effective partnerships in business. Parry, Clint // Inside Tucson Business;1/22/2007, Vol. 16 Issue 32, p17 

    The article provides information on how to build effective partnerships in business. The author implies that an effective partnership can help a business reach a much greater level of success, in less time, than if the same individuals pursued the business using each's own efforts. He added that...

  • EMC zeros in on SMB market. Krakora, Diane // eWeek;11/27/2006, Vol. 23 Issue 47, Special section p22 

    The author reflects on the EMC Insignia's possible alignment for the small and midsize businesses' storage market. According to the author when she had talked to EMC Vice President Steve Houck, Houck has described an incredible confluence of forces within the small and midsize business market...

  • Focus on business processes, not technology. Romanow, Kara // Aftermarket Business;Nov2003, Vol. 113 Issue 11, p152 

    Focuses on the doubt of many companies about collaboration as a practice area of business processes. Reasons behind the skepticism for collaborative processes; Factors contributing to successful collaborative relationships; Need for companies to address governance issues prior to any technology...

  • Diary of a Startup.  // Entrepreneur;Dec2005, Vol. 33 Issue 12, p117 

    Presents views and insights of the author on looking for prospective business partners in a startup business in the U.S.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics