There cannot be two omnipotent beings

Baillie, James; Hagen, Jason
August 2008
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Aug2008, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p21
Academic Journal
We argue that there is no metaphysically possible world with two or more omnipotent beings, due to the potential for conflicts of will between them. We reject the objection that omnipotent beings could exist in the same world when their wills could not conflict. We then turn to Alfred Mele and M.P. Smith’s argument that two coexisting beings could remain omnipotent even if, on some occasions, their wills cancel each other out so that neither can bring about what they intend. We argue that this argument has an absurd consequence, namely having to regard an utterly powerless being as omnipotent.


Related Articles

  • Divine eternity. Mawson, T. // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Aug2008, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p35 

    I argue that Open Theism leads to a retreat from ascribing to God ‘complete omniscience’. Having surrendered this ground, the Open Theist cannot but retreat from ascribing to God complete omnipotence; the Open Theist must admit that God might perform actions which He reasonably...

  • C. Stevens Evans, Kierkegaard: On Faith and the Self. Hall, Ronald // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Aug2008, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p51 

    The article discusses the Kierkegaardian studies, a collection of essays written by C. Steven Evans of Baylor University. It mentions that the interpretation of Evans on Kierkegaardian faith can be seen in his defense of Kierkegaardian as being of no enemy reason, objectivity and realism. It...

  • Catholic Conceptions of Faith: A Generational Analysis. Williams, Andrea S.; Davidson, James D. // Sociology of Religion;Fall96, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p273 

    This article describes generational differences in Catholics' conceptions of faith. The differences were found in fifteen focus groups with Catholics from each of three birth cohorts. The youngest cohort of participants was born between 1961 and 1976 and expressed its faith in individualistic...

  • O UNO E O SER NO PENSAMENTO DE MEISTER ECKHART. Raschietti, Matteo // Trans/Form/Acao;2012 Special Issue, Vol. 35, p79 

    The fundamental problem of Eckhartian speculation is that of the connection between the truth of the unique being as God and the question of His knowledge. By creating a synthesis of the Augustinian-Platonic tradition and the thought of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, the Dominican master...

  • Limitations of the Scientific Method. Byrns, Ruth Katherine // America;5/30/1931, Vol. 45 Issue 8, p184 

    The article focuses on the limitations of scientific method. The complete faith vested in experimental or empirical method and in observation, and the complete rejection of introspection, experience, and opinion are evidences of the adaptation of the scientific method. However, the author notes...

  • Can Faith and Reason be Reconciled? Herberg, Will // New Republic;10/24/55, Vol. 133 Issue 17, p19 

    The article discusses about a book, "Biblical Religion and the Search for Ultimate Reality," by Paul Tillich. The relation between faith and reason has long perplexed philosopher and theologian alike. With the revival of biblical theology in recent years, and the turn taken by philosophy in the...

  • PLANTINGA'S EPISTEMOLOGY OF RELIGION - SOME QUESTIONS. de Oliveira, Rogel Esteves // Veritas;maio-ago2012, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p9 

    This paper raises some questions and objections to Alvin Plantinga's epistemology of religion. In Part I, we have a non-believer speaking (an agnostic about God, spirits or the like). She is in fact an epistemologist and is not very comfortable with Plantinga's reformed epistemology. In Part II,...

  • WHAT IS A SKEPTIC?  // Skeptic;2007, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p5 

    The author reflects on the meaning of the term "skeptic." Some people believe that skepticism is rejection of new ideas. They also confuse skeptic with cynic and think that skeptics are a bunch of grumpy curmudgeons unwilling to accept any claim that challenges that status quo. The author said...

  • Matthew Flannagan.  // Investigate;Nov2010, Vol. 10 Issue 118, p24 

    The author reflects on the validity of the claims of the Christians and its religion. He cites his experience in attending a lecture on science and religion at the University of Auckland, in which a student has objected to the claim made by some Christians that their religion was true and that...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics