Uninsured deposits and the too-big-to-fail policy in 1984 and 1991

Athavale, Manoj
June 2000
American Business Review;Jun2000, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p123
Academic Journal
Examines changes in the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) policy and market assessment of default risk in the pricing of uninsured certificates of deposit in the United States from 1984 to 1991. Reaction of financial markets on the policy; Impact of policymakers' actions on default pricing of uninsured certificates; Effect of abandoning TBTF during banking crisis.


Related Articles

  • FASB eyeing market value accounting of deposits. Siegel, David // American Banker;9/16/1993, Vol. 158 Issue 178, p1 

    Reports on the plan of the Financial Accounting Standards Board to extend market value accounting to deposits and other liabilities. Drafting of a proposal; Comments of various bankers; Support from the insurance industry.

  • Avoiding withdrawal pain.  // Overdrive;Nov99, Vol. 39 Issue 11, p156 

    Focuses on strategies recommended for withdrawing bank deposits in the United State without circumventing or violating banking laws on cash withdrawals.

  • Monetary safe haven.  // State Government News;Oct97, Vol. 40 Issue 8, p17 

    Reports that Montana has initiated a law that allows private banks in the state to accept capital from people who are not American citizens or residents. Citing of the lure of stability and safety; Protection of assets from seizure by foreign governments.

  • Battle looms in legislature over government deposits.  // Crain's New York Business;03/17/97, Vol. 13 Issue 11, p36 

    Reports on the controversy in Albany, New York, concerning where municipal governments can invest their deposits. Information on where some of the money is invested; Why money is deposited at some of these institutions; What clarification local governments want from lawmakers; Claims by some...

  • Loophole would let Mercantile hold 25% of Missouri deposits. Chase, Brett // American Banker;1/7/1997, Vol. 162 Issue 4, p7 

    Reports that Mercantile Bancorp.'s acquisition in Saint Louis, Missouri will bring its share of deposits in the state to nearly one fourth. State law on deposits share; Acquisition of Roosevelt Financial Group Inc.; Loophole in the law taken advantage of by Mercantile; Mercantile's proposal to...

  • Public Deposits Bill To Gov.'s Desk.  // Credit Union Journal;6/9/2003, Vol. 7 Issue 23, p2 

    Reports that the Oregon Senate Bill 331, which would allow credit unions to accept deposits from a variety of public entities, passed the floor of the Oregon House of Representatives.

  • In Oregon, CUs Get Public Deposits, But Bank-Backed Bill Dies. Bartlett, Michael // Credit Union Journal;5/26/2003, Vol. 7 Issue 21, p3 

    Reports on the approval by the Oregon state House Business, Labor and Consumer Affairs Committee of a bill that would allow credit unions to accept deposits from public entities. Failure of the committee to vote on a credit union taxation bill sponsored by Oregon bankers; Approval of the public...

  • Firstar-Mercantile Merger Prompts Iowa to Revisit Deposit-Share Law. WOKER, CRAIG // American Banker;11/15/1999, Vol. 164 Issue 219, p1 

    Reports that the state of Iowa is reconsidering its deposit-concentration law. Expected proposals on changes to the law from the state General Assembly in early 2000; Renewal of interest in the issue after state regulators allowed Firstar Corp. of Cincinnati, Ohio, to buy Mercantile Bancorp of...

  • Proof of identity.  // Accountancy;Aug1991, Vol. 108 Issue 1176, p38 

    Reports on a bank deposit regulation in Europe aimed at preventing money laundering. Presentation of proof of identity by anyone depositing more than 15,000 European currency units.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics