One Nation, Under... The Watchmaker?: Intelligent Design and the Establishment Clause
Tags: INTELLIGENT design (Teleology); PUBLIC schools; CURRICULA (Courses of study); EDUCATIONAL law & legislation
Related Articles
- SEEING GOVERNMENT PURPOSE THROUGH THE OBJECTIVE OBSERVER'S EYES: THE EVOLUTION-INTELLIGENT DESIGN DEBATES. Bowman, Kristi L. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2006, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p417
Debates about teaching intelligent design in public school science classes are inflaming communities across the nation. These controversies present thorny Establishment Clause questions at a time when that doctrine is less clear than ever. The ambiguity is not due to a lack of case law: Just...
- Class Dismissed!: How The AU Team Tackled ID In California. Lynn, Barry W. // Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p23
The article discusses the battle of the Americans United for the Separation of Church and State against the teaching of intelligent design in Frazier Mountain High School in California. The course was viewed as a kind of infomercial for creationism and is thought to violate the church-state...
- Ohio Education Board Reverses Course On Promoting 'Intelligent-Design' Creationism. // Church & State;Mar2006, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p17
The article reports on the decision of the Ohio Education Board to eliminate intelligent design from the state science standards. Americans United threatened to file a case against the removal of evolution instruction in schools. Other critics of intelligent design usage claimed that the lesson...
- Utah School Officials Reject 'Intelligent Design' // Church & State;Oct2005, Vol. 58 Issue 9, p3
Reports that Utah's State Board of Education has rejected a proposal to introduce intelligent design (ID) into public school science courses. Basis of the school officials in rejecting the proposal; Preference of the board to keep evolution in the biology curriculum; Assertion of the board...
- AN EVOLVING CONFLICT. Tebo, Margaret Graham // ABA Journal;Mar2006, Vol. 92 Issue 3, p20
The article discusses issues involving the legality of the mandatory teaching of intelligent design in Los Angeles, California. Intelligent design is not creationism, which the U.S. Supreme Court barred from the public school curriculum in 1987 according to lawyer Casey Luskin. After parents of...
- California. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;May-Aug2005, Vol. 25 Issue 3/4, p15
The article reports on the views made by California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell during a conference at the Los Angeles Natural History Museum on September 28, 2005, regarding the decision of public school science classes in the state to accept intelligent design....
- The English National Curriculum: A Landmark in Educational Reform. Davies, Martin R. // Educational Leadership;Feb1991, Vol. 48 Issue 5, p28
This article examines the National Curriculum stipulated in the British Education Reform Act of 1988. The National Curriculum represents a massive change in Great Britain. For the first time ever, all public elementary and high schools are required to follow a common curriculum, prescribed in...
- Alternative Viewpoints about Biological Origins as Taught in Public Schools. Luskin, Casey // Journal of Church & State;Summer2005, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p583
Reviews several laws to assess the ability to present creation science, intelligent design theory or scientific criticisms of evolution in public school districts in the U.S. which have various teaching viewpoints. Restrictions faced by the teaching of creation science; Background on the Lemon...
- VICTORY IN DOVER! Boston, Rob // Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p4
The article discusses the decision of the court that declared the adoption of intelligent design in the curriculum in a public school as illegal in Dover, Pennsylvania. District Judge John E. Jones ruled that the program was unconstitutional because of its violation of the First Amendment's...
