CSR Pipeline Systems

February 1998
Underground Construction;Feb98, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p68
Trade Publication
Reports on CSR Pipeline Systems' decision to approach the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas to reactivate its pending patent infringement lawsuit against American Pipe & Plastics and its AM-Liner sewer rehabilitation products and installation. US Patent Office's release of re-examination certificates for the U-Liner patents.


Related Articles

  • Court upholds Insituform suit. Codling, Phyllis A. // Plastics News;2/1/1999, Vol. 10 Issue 51, p12 

    Reports that a United States District Court in San Francisco, California, upheld a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Insituform Technologies Inc. against American Pipe and Plastics Inc. Details of the lawsuit; Damages awarded to the plaintiff; Comments by Bobbi Zurn, American Pipe and...

  • Insituform, American Pipe dropping appeals. Ledson, Shannon // Plastics News;10/18/1999, Vol. 11 Issue 35, p36 

    Reports that Insituform Technologies Inc. and American Pipe & Plastics Inc. have agreed to drop all appeals on a 1998 patent-infringement decision by the United States District Court in San Francisco, California. Amount in damages to be paid by American Pipe & Plastics to Insituform; Terms of...

  • Pipe patent suit resumes following review. Urey, Craig // Plastics News;1/5/1998, Vol. 9 Issue 45, p7 

    Reports that on December 9, 1997, Pipe Liners Incorporated of New Orleans, Louisiana, reopened its patent infringement lawsuit against New York-based American Pipe & Plastics Incorporated. When and why the lawsuit was first filed; What put a halt to proceedings in 1996; Circumstances surrounding...

  • Cases.  // Journal of Criminal Law;Jun2007, Vol. 71 Issue 3, pv 

    The article presents a list of court cases.

  • Untitled.  // New Yorker;11/11/1974, Vol. 50 Issue 38, p139 

    An excerpt from "Jacksonville Florida Times-Union," is presented concerning a litigation proceeding.

  • Prop 8 appeal to be heard Dec. 6.  // Windy City Times;10/27/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p9 

    The article announces that oral arguments in the Proposition 8 case, Perry v. Schwarzenegger, will be heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on December 6, 2010 at 10 a.m. at the James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse in San Francisco, California.

  • Court Unreasonably Refuses to Suspend Trial for Litigant's Religious Observance. Zemil, Brian A. // Litigation News;Summer2011, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p7 

    The article discusses a court case, Neustadter v. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver spring Inc., wherein the highest court of Maryland released that the court can misuse its discretion by refusing to suspend case of a litigant because of his two days absence for religious reason. It further states...

  • Plaintiff's Own Testimony Dooms Case. Rogak, Lawrence N. // Insurance Advocate;1/2/2006, Vol. 117 Issue 1, p12 

    The article presents the court case of Torain versus Labiner filed at the Civil Court in Bronx County, New York. The reason of the complaint was the plaintiff's fall from a flight of stairs at the defendant dentist's office. The testimony of the plaintiff and the defendant, and the grounds...

  • ROUNDUP. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Feb2001, Vol. 11 Issue 111, p74 

    Presents a circuit by circuit update on corporate cases in the United States as of February 2001. Inclusion of the New York City Transit Authority's dispute of a fraudulently procured settlement and judgment in personal injury actions; Petition by Shell Oil Co. and OXY USA Inc. for a rehearing...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics