TITLE

Rad-By-Rad (Bit-By-Bit): Triumph of Evidence Over Activities Fostering Fear of Radiogenic Cancers at Low Doses

AUTHOR(S)
Strzelczyk, J.; Potter, W.; Zdrojewicz, Z.
PUB. DATE
October 2007
SOURCE
Dose-Response;2007, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p275
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Large segments of Western populations hold sciences in low esteem. This trend became particularly pervasive in the field of radiation sciences in recent decades. The resulting lack of knowledge, easily filled with fear that feeds on itself, makes people susceptible to prevailing dogmas. Decades-long moratorium on nuclear power in the US, resentment of "anything nuclear", and delay/refusal to obtain medical radiation procedures are some of the societal consequences. The problem has been exacerbated by promulgation of the linear-no-threshold (LNT) dose response model by advisory bodies such as the ICRP, NCRP and others. This model assumes no safe level of radiation and implies that response is the same per unit dose regardless of the total dose. The most recent (June 2005) report from the National Research Council, BEIR VII (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation) continues this approach and quantifies potential cancer risks at low doses by linear extrapolation of risk values obtained from epidemiological observations of populations exposed to high doses, 0.2 Sv to 3 Sv. It minimizes the significance of a lack of evidence for adverse effects in populations exposed to low doses, and discounts documented beneficial effects of low dose exposures on the human immune system. The LNT doctrine is in direct conflict with current findings of radiobiology and important features of modern radiation oncology. Fortunately, these aspects are addressed in-depth in another major report�issued jointly in March 2005 by two French Academies, of Sciences and of Medicine. The latter report is much less publicized, and thus it is a responsibility of radiation professionals, physicists, nuclear engineers, and physicians to become familiar with its content and relevant studies, and to widely disseminate this information. To counteract biased media, we need to be creative in developing means of sharing good news about radiation with co-workers, patients, and the general public.
ACCESSION #
32523436

 

Related Articles

  • LOW-LET-INDUCED RADIOPROTECTIVE MECHANISMS WITHIN A STOCHASTIC TWO-STAGE CANCER MODEL. Schöllnberger, H.; Stewart, R. D.; Mitchel, R. E. J. // Dose-Response;2005, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p508 

    A stochastic two-stage cancer model with clonal expansion was used to investigate the potential impact on human lung cancer incidence of some aspects of the hormesis mechanisms suggested by Feinendegen (Health Phys. 52 663--669, 1987). The model was applied to low doses of low-LET radiation...

  • QUANTIFICATION OF RISK-BENEFIT IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. O'Brien, B.; Van Der Putten, W. // Radiation Protection Dosimetry;2008 Special Issue, Vol. 129 Issue 1-3, p59 

    The increased use of interventional radiological procedures brings with it an increased risk of cancer induction due to the possible high radiation levels used. This risk must be balanced against any viable alternatives and should take into account the individual risks and benefits. The purpose...

  • Very Large Amounts of Radiation are Required to Produce Cancer. Brooks, Antone L.; Hui, T. Edmond; Couch, Lezlie A. // Dose-Response;2007, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p263 

    The public fear of radiation is in part driven by the Linear No Threshold Hypothesis (LNTH), or the concept that each and every ionization increases the risk for cancer. Even if this were true, it is important to recognize that the increased risk is very small at low doses and cannot be...

  • Health Effects of Low Level Radiation: When Will We Acknowledge the Reality? Cuttler, J. M. // Dose-Response;2007, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p292 

    The 1986 April 26th Chernobyl event was the worst nuclear power accident�it killed 31 people. Its significance was exaggerated immensely because of the pervasive fear of ionizing radiation that has been indoctrinated in all of humanity. In reality, our environment includes radiation from...

  • Low-Dose Cancer Risk Modeling Must Recognize Up-Regulation of Protection. Feinendegen, Ludwig E.; Pollycove, Myron; Neumann, Ronald D. // Dose-Response;2010, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p227 

    Ionizing radiation primarily perturbs the basic molecular level proportional to dose, with potential damage propagation to higher levels: cells, tissues, organs, and whole body. There are three types of defenses against damage propagation. These operate deterministically and below a certain...

  • Special Issue Introduction. Scott, Bobby R. // Dose-Response;2010, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p122 

    No abstract available.

  • Targeted Radiotherapy: Microgray Doses and the Bystander Effect. Mairs, Robert J.; Fullerton, Natasha E.; Zalutsky, Michael R.; Boyd, Marie // Dose-Response;2007, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p204 

    Indirect effects may contribute to the efficacy of radiotherapy by sterilizing malignant cells that are not directly irradiated. However, little is known of the influence of indirect effects in targeted radionuclide treatment. We compared ?-radiation-induced bystander effects with those...

  • Requirements for Identification of Low Dose and Non-Linear Mutagenic Responses to Ionising Radiation. Sykes, Pamela J.; Day, Tanya K. // Dose-Response;2007, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p308 

    Cancer results from multiple changes in gene expression that can occur both genetically and epigenetically. High doses of radiation can lead to mutations and cancer. At high doses the number of mutations caused by radiation is essentially linear with dose. Low dose radiation induced protective...

  • EFECTO DE BAJAS DOSIS DE RAYOS X SOBRE LA TOLERANCIA A LA SALINIDAD EN PLANTULAS. Fern�ndez, A. Ram�rez; Gonz�lez N��ez, L. M.; Talauera, S. P�rez // Nucleus;1998, Issue 25, p44 

    The work presents the effect of different radiation doses (ranging from 50 to 200 (3y), applied on irradiated lettuce seeds in an X-ray source for surface therapy, with a working regime of 30 kV and 10 mA and a dose rate of 12,9 Gy/min on the germination and growth of plantules in the presence...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics