Public Employers Can Push Comp Time Usage
- Court: Union contract can define pay-for-dressing rule. // HR Specialist: Employment Law;Mar2014, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p5
The article reports on the verdict by the U.S. Supreme Court which favors employers rules and policy on pay-for-dressing in union contracts with specific time arrangements.
- Private Rights of Action Appear Harder to Come By. // Defense Counsel Journal;Jul2001, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p374
Reports on the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Alexander versus Sandoval case, which held that private individuals do not a private cause of action to enforce disparate impact rules promulgated by the Justice Department to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Provisions of the...
- Tobacco Wins This Round. Rubin, Jeffrey // Scholastic News -- Senior Edition;04/24/2000, Vol. 68 Issue 24, p6
Unveils the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the lawsuit Food and Drug Administration (FDA) versus Williamson Tobacco Corporation.
- Bank Merger Developments in1967. // Banking;Jan68, Vol. 60 Issue 7, p28
Report on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court which sent bank merger cases back to their respective districts for trial. Examples of cases that were included in the ruling; Implications of the ruling of the Supreme Court.
- Court rules for suspect on timing of confession. // Buffalo Law Journal;4/9/2009, Vol. 81 Issue 29, p1
The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case involving prisoner Johnnie Corley, who was arrested on suspicion of robbing a credit union. The court ruled that confessions obtained by federal authorities before a suspect's first court appearance might be inadmissible if...
- First Amendment Inversions. Greenbaum, Eli // Yale Law Journal;May2002, Vol. 111 Issue 7, p1861
Discusses the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on a case which used the nonpublic forum to invert the First Amendment by privileging conduct even as it belittles speech. Details on the case; Opinion on the speech/conduct distinction; Conclusion.
- SUPREME COURT RULES UNION HAS STANDING TO SUE UNDER WARN ACT. // Labor Law Journal;May96, Vol. 47 Issue 5, p342
This article focuses on the judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court that a union has standing to sue an employer on behalf of its members for violating the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act). The WARN Act was designed by the Congress to allow a union to sue an employer on...
- Supreme Court Resolves Overtime Issue for Home Care Workers. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2007 Q2, p1
The article discusses the limitations to the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that home care workers who provide companionship services are exempt from overtime even if they are employed by a third-party employer. The exemption does not apply to companionship services provided by trained personnel....
- Looking Back on Muller v. Oregon. Collins, Ronald K.L.; Friesen, Jennifer // American Bar Association Journal;Mar1983, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p294
Reports on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the lawsuit filed against Curt Muller for violating the ten-hour work day law for women in Oregon. Victories of protective labor law advocates in legislatures and courts; Obstacles to labor legislation for women and minors; Submission of briefs to...