Supervisors agree to reduce budget, but taxes will still goup

Lamb, Jim
May 2008
Inside Tucson Business;5/26/2008, Vol. 17 Issue 51, p5
The article reports on the approval of a $1.46 billion budget by the county Board of Supervisors to operate Pima County in Arizona for the 2008-2009 fiscal year. It states that the total budget represents a 1.5% decrease from the fiscal year's budget of $1.48 billion. It signifies that the property tax will decrease and most homeowners will pay more in taxes because their assessed values are high.


Related Articles

  • First property tax payment is due. Gray, Michael // Michael Gray, CPA's Tax & Business Insight;Dec2012, p12 

    The article reminds taxpayers that the first property tax payment for 2011-2012 fiscal year in Santa Clara County, California is due December 10, 2012.

  • ADVENTURES OF A TAX LEAGUER. Steed, Hal // Saturday Evening Post;11/11/1933, Vol. 206 Issue 20, p29 

    Relates an author's experience regarding county supervisors and their capacity to raise county tax rate. Capacity of county tax to provide emergency relief to unemployed; Public reaction towards county tax rate increases; Duties and responsibilities of a county supervisors.

  • City Council Approves $3.6 Billion Operating Budget. Vadum, Matthew // Bond Buyer;05/03/2001, Vol. 336 Issue 31131, p4 

    Focuses on the fiscal year operating budget of the City Council in Washington D.C. Proposal of Mayor Anthony A. Williams for fiscal 2002; Compliance of the approved budget with congressional requirements; Consideration of the triennial real estate phase out in the budget.

  • Timing is everything.  // Westchester County Business Journal;4/21/2008, Vol. 47 Issue 16, p4 

    The article reports on the move among financial supervisors to merge public services as volatility is seen in New York's financial market and it can also cut property taxes. Thomas DiNapoli, state comptroller, has been supporting sharing services in municipalities and schools. Moreover, staff...

  • Mayor needs to rethink debate. Wright, Keith L.T. // New York Amsterdam News;6/24/2004, Vol. 95 Issue 26, p13 

    Last year, in an effort to close a looming multi-billion dollar budget gap, a Mayor led the charge in securing an 18.5% increase in the property tax. And yet, just one year later, there is a surplus and the Mayor has proposed a $400 homeowner rebate. How can this surplus exist when the Mayor has...

  • Cap Costs Clark County. Kelemen, Jasmina // Bond Buyer;7/8/2005, Vol. 353 Issue 32170, p39 

    Reports that Clark County, Nevada lost more than $100 million in projected revenue for fiscal 2006 as a result of a property tax cap that state lawmakers passed in April 2005.

  • Iowa property tax slows its pace.  // Wallaces Farmer;Sep2011, Vol. 136 Issue 9, p27 

    The article presents information on the increase in the total Iowa property tax bill by 3.4 percent for fiscal year 2012 on the basis of data provided by the Iowa Department of Management. INSET: Key Points.

  • September Surplus. Sigo, Shelly // Bond Buyer;10/13/2005, Vol. 354 Issue 32237, p31 

    Reports on the revenue collections of the state of Alabama for the fiscal year 2005.

  • Delaware to Collect $3.02B in Fiscal '06, Up From Estimates. Ackerman, Andrew // Bond Buyer;9/21/2005, Vol. 353 Issue 32222, p7 

    Reports on the collection of multimillion-dollar of revenue expected by Delaware in fiscal 2006, a 13.7 million-dollar gain from revised estimates in the U.S. Details of the estimation made by the Delaware Economic and Financial Advisory Council (DEFAC); Statement of finance secretary Richard...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics