TITLE

International Dialogue on the Public Reporting of Clinical Trial Outcome and Results -- PROCTOR Meeting

PUB. DATE
April 2008
SOURCE
Croatian Medical Journal;2008, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p267
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
32143797

 

Related Articles

  • The ICMJE and URM: Providing Independent Advice for the Conduct of Biomedical Research and Publication. Weyden, Martin B Van der // Mens Sana Monographs;Jan2007, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p15 

    The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) is a working group of editors of selected medical journals that meets annually. Founded in Vancouver, Canada, in 1978, it currently consists of 11 member journals and a representative of the US National Library of Medicine. The major...

  • Outcome Reporting in Industry-Sponsored Trials of Gabapentin for Off-Label Use. Vedula, S. Swaroop; Bero, Lisa; Scherer, Roberta W.; Dickersin, Kay // New England Journal of Medicine;11/12/2009, Vol. 361 Issue 20, p1963 

    Background: There is good evidence of selective outcome reporting in published reports of randomized trials. Methods: We examined reporting practices for trials of gabapentin funded by Pfizer and Warner-Lambert's subsidiary, Parke-Davis (hereafter referred to as Pfizer and Parke-Davis) for...

  • International trials registry is missing important information, study finds. Wise, Jacqui // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;9/12/2009, Vol. 339 Issue 7721, p594 

    The article discusses a study on the lack of important information from many trials recorded on the international register of clinical trials ClinicalTrials.gov managed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. The researchers, led by Joseph Ross of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, sampled a...

  • Some Main Problems Eroding the Credibility and Relevance of Randomized Trials. Ioannidis, John P. A. // Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases;2008, Vol. 66 Issue 2, p135 

    Randomized trials are an excellent research design with major advantages. However, randomized trials are not immune to biases, and inferences from them may be sometimes flawed or irrelevant. The present review addresses, in brief some of the major threats to the credibility and relevance of the...

  • Does direction of results of abstracts submitted to scientific conferences on drug addiction predict full publication? Vecchi, Simona; Belleudi, Valeria; Amato, Laura; Davoli, Marina; Perucci, Carlo A. // BMC Medical Research Methodology;2009, Vol. 9, Special section p1 

    Background: Data from scientific literature show that about 63% of abstracts presented at biomedical conferences will be published in full. Some studies have indicated that full publication is associated with the direction of results (publication bias). No study has looked into the occurrence of...

  • NCI Study Demonstrates Significant Overall Survival and Time-to-Next-Treatment Benefits for BiovaxID(r) Cancer Vaccine Following Rituximab-Chemotherapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Study.  // Biomedical Market Newsletter;6/7/2012, Vol. 21, p1 

    The article reports on an announcement made by Biovest International Inc., subsidiary of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals Inc. related to the release of the outcomes of the Phase II BiovaxID lymphoma vaccine clinical trial by the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI). It informs that the results were...

  • Reporting Discrepancies Between the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database and Peer-Reviewed Publications. Hartung, Daniel M.; Zarin, Deborah A.; Guise, Jeanne-Marie; McDonagh, Marian; Paynter, Robin; Helfand, Mark // Annals of Internal Medicine;4/1/2014, Vol. 160 Issue 7, p477 

    Background: ClinicalTrials.gov requires reporting of result summaries for many drug and device trials. Purpose: To evaluate the consistency of reporting of trials that are registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and published in the literature. Data Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov...

  • Public Involvement in the Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials: A Review. Boote, Jonathan; Baird, Wendy; Sutton, Anthea // International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences;2011, Vol. 5 Issue 11, p91 

    Background: Public involvement is health research policy in the UK and internationally. There is a need to establish a robust evidence base on the impact of public involvement on research processes and outcomes. Purpose: To review examples of public involvement in the design and conduct of...

  • Insufficient evidence for effectiveness of any treatment for oral lichen planus. Keenan, Analia Veitz; Ferraiolo, Debra // Evidence-Based Dentistry;Sep2011, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p85 

    Data sourcesThe Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline and Embase databases were searched with no restrictions regarding language or date of publication. Bibliographies of identified publications were also checked for...

  • Clinical trials: The case for registration. Sataloff, Robert Thayer // ENT: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal;Jun2006, Vol. 85 Issue 6, p352 

    The article addresses the problem of unpublished results of clinical trials. Some researchers fail to publish because of negative or inconclusive outcomes; other investigators have given up control and a funding organization has refused publication. The International Committee of Medical Journal...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics