TITLE

LOPEZ, MORRISON, AND RAICH: FEDERALISM IN THE REHNQUIST COURT

AUTHOR(S)
Graglia, Lino A.
PUB. DATE
March 2008
SOURCE
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2008, p761
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the existence of federalism in the U.S. Supreme Court before the 1995 decision in the case United States versus Lopez which has shocked constitutional observers by asserting a judicially-enforceable limit on the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. Accordingly, it involved a challenge of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. It states that in the said decision, the Court rejected the radional basis test.
ACCESSION #
32024821

 

Related Articles

  • Strategies for Civil Rights Litigators Amid the Supreme Court's Constitutional Counterrevolution. Henderson, Thomas J. // Human Rights;Fall2002, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p20 

    This article briefly explores how the U.S. Supreme Court has altered the interpretation of the Constitution and then examines strategies for civil rights litigation in the wake of the Court's new approach to federalism. The Supreme Court's "federalism" decisions threaten the very existence of...

  • State Sovereignty and the Eleventh Amendment in the U.S. Supreme Court: The 1988 Term. Jackson, Vicki C. // Publius: The Journal of Federalism;Winter92, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p39 

    During its 1988 term, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed two important aspects of the Eleventh Amendment, which generally protects states from being sued in federal courts. First, the Court held that the Congress hasp power to abrogate states' immunity from suit—to subject states to suits...

  • RECONSTRUCTING MURDOCK V. MEMPHIS. Collins, Michael G. // Virginia Law Review;Nov2012, Vol. 98 Issue 7, p1439 

    The article discusses a court case of Murdock v. City of Memphis and its impact on the American federalism. The review of the statutes of Reconstruction-era, the amendments made to several sections of these statutes and the powers provided by the U.S. Congress to the Supreme Court are discussed....

  • Supreme Court Actions Add Pressure to Beleaguered FDA. Thiel, Karl // BioWorld Today;3/3/2008, Vol. 19 Issue 42, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Riegel v. Medtronic and its impact on the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The decision of the court states that no liability suits can be brought in state courts if the product in question is approved by the FDA. The U.S....

  • 1866 and 1964 Laws Are Independent.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep75, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p607 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that filing a job discrimination complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not stop the time period for filing a similar action under the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Court...

  • UNITED STATES v. LOCKE, GOVERNOR OF WASHINGTON, et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    This article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case United States v. Locke, governor of Washington, et al., case number 98-1701, argued on December 7, 1999 and decided on March 6, 2000. Events relating to oil spills have prompted Congress and the State of Washington to enact...

  • The Federal "Claim" in the District Courts: Osborn, Verlinden, and Protective Jurisdiction. Vázquez, Carlos M. // California Law Review;Fall2007, Vol. 95 Issue 5, p1731 

    The article provides explanation why the "federal question" analysis in Osborn v. Bank of the United States is unpersuasive, and how a "federal claim" analysis would have provided a more convincing and narrower rationale for the holding. It then explains why the Supreme Court's "federal...

  • Public Opposes "Gag Rule" Decision. Klitsch, Michael // Family Planning Perspectives;Nov/Dec91, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p244 

    The article focuses on issues related to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision supporting the federal government's prohibition on family planning funds for clinics offering information about abortion. According to the results of a recent survey, two-thirds of Americans disapprove of the decision....

  • THE VERTICAL SEPARATION OF POWERS. Nourse, Victoria // Duke Law Journal;Dec1999, Vol. 49 Issue 3, p749 

    Standard understandings of the separation of powers begin with the concept of function. Professor Nourse argues that function alone cannot predict important changes in structural incentives and thus serves as a poor proxy for assessing real risks to governmental structure. To illustrate this...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics