Crane Composites Inc. is exonerated

April 2008
Trailer / Body Builders;Apr2008, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p59
Trade Publication
The article discusses a court case wherein the Federal Court of Riverside, California acquitted Crane Composites Inc. from charges of breach of contract and fraud in 2008. The entry notes that the lawsuit accused the company of designing and selling defective sidewall material installed for recreational vehicles (RV). It also cites the jury's unanimous decision absolving Crane Composites of $28 million in compensatory damages, as well as, its contention that plaintiff National RV was not entitled to receive punitive damages.


Related Articles

  • Deloitte Sues Former Vice Chairman.  // Public Accounting Report;11/15/2008, Vol. 32 Issue 21, p1 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed by accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP against Thomas Flanagan, former longtime partner and vice chairman of the firm, at the federal court in Delaware. The accounting firm allegedly claims that Flanagan used inside information to trade in client...

  • INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.  // International Law Update;Feb2009, Vol. 15, p18 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff claims a breach of contract on sales of stocks of a company in Washington, D.C. The federal court reviewed the allegation related to the violation of the defendant on the confidentiality agreement stipulated in the contract. The court also...

  • Platinum faces new deception claims. MILLER, VALERIE // Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);7/27/2009, Vol. 26 Issue 30, pP5 

    The article reports on the claims against the Platinum Hotel and Condominium's developer and management company by a group of buyers for alleged deception. Over 30 plaintiffs filed the lawsuit at the Nevada federal court on July 17, 2009 alleging Platinum Condominium Development, Marcus Hotels...

  • The cost of going to trial. Spizzirri, John // Crain's Chicago Business;9/19/2005, Vol. 28 Issue 38, p34 

    The article reports that only 16 percent of civil lawsuits make it to trial in state court and 2 percent in federal court, according to the National Center for State Courts. Even in basic breach-of-contract cases between small companies, where there might be only one or two witnesses on each...

  • CHAPTER 10: Selecting the Decision Maker.  // Represent Yourself in Court (9781413307108);Jan2008, p211 

    Chapter 10 of the book "Represent Yourself in Court" is presented. It discusses the entire jury process. It is stated that trial by jury is one of the traditions of the American legal system. In most states, one cannot have a jury trial in cases involving child support and child custody. However...

  • It would be wise to consider making a federal case of it. Walters, Bryan // Grand Rapids Business Journal;6/1/2010, Vol. 28 Issue 22, p8 

    The article cites several business reasons to consider having a lawsuit resolved in federal court, such as having streamlined discovery procedures, alternative dispute resolution, and resolution of pre-trial disputes.

  • Medical equipment suppliers sue over bidding program. Young, Jeffrey // Hill;6/12/2008, Vol. 15 Issue 69, p17 

    The article reports that the American Association for Homecare (AAHomecare) announced that it filed suit in a Washington, D.C. federal court against Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) acting Administrator Kerry Weems.

  • Lifetime wants 'Runway' in federal court. Nordyke, Kimberly // Hollywood Reporter;10/20/2008, Vol. 407 Issue 1, p15 

    The article reports on the decision of Lifetime Networks to move the case filed by NBC Universal Inc. against the company to the federal court in Los Angeles, California. It reveals that NBC Universal alleges Weinstein Co. for violating its contract for the broadcast of "Project Runway" after...

  • TRADEMARKS.  // International Law Update;Jun2003, Vol. 9, p90 

    Canadian Federal Court of Appeal expunges trademark on words "Boston Chicken" from its registry for lack of distinctiveness acquired by usage in Canada but upholds registration of corresponding logo


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics