Targeted Radiotherapy: Microgray Doses and the Bystander Effect

Mairs, Robert J.; Fullerton, Natasha E.; Zalutsky, Michael R.; Boyd, Marie
July 2007
Dose-Response;2007, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p204
Academic Journal
Indirect effects may contribute to the efficacy of radiotherapy by sterilizing malignant cells that are not directly irradiated. However, little is known of the influence of indirect effects in targeted radionuclide treatment. We compared ?-radiation-induced bystander effects with those resulting from exposure to three radiohaloanalogues of meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG): [131I]MIBG (low linear energy transfer (LET) �-emitter), [123I]MIBG (high LET Auger electron emitter), and meta-[211At]astatobenzylguanidine ([211At]MABG) (high LET a-emitter). Cells exposed to media from ?-irradiated cells exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in survival fraction at low dosage and a plateau in cell kill at > 2 Gy. Cells treated with media from [131I]MIBG demonstrated a dose-response relationship with respect to clonogenic cell death and no annihilation of this effect at high radiopharmaceutical dosage. In contrast, cells receiving media from cultures treated with [211At]MABG or [123I]MIBG exhibited dose-dependent toxicity at low dose but elimination of cytotoxicity with increasing radiation dose (i.e. U-shaped survival curves). Therefore radionuclides emitting high LET radiation may elicit toxic or protective effects on neighboring untargeted cells at low and high dose respectively. We conclude that radiopharmaceutical-induced bystander effects may depend on LET and be distinct from those elicited by conventional radiotherapy.


Related Articles

  • Protective Bystander Effects Simulated with the State-Vector Model. Sch�llnberger, Helmut; Eckl, Peter M. // Dose-Response;2007, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p187 

    Apoptosis induced in non-hit bystander cells is an important biological mechanism which operates after exposure to low doses of low-LET radiation. This process was implemented into a deterministic multistage model for in vitro neoplastic transformation: the State-Vector Model (SVM). The new...

  • A Role for Bioelectric Effects in the Induction of Bystander Signals by Ionizing Radiation? Mothersill, C.; Moran, G.; McNeill, F.; Gow, M. D.; Denbeigh, J.; Prestwich, W.; Seymour, C. B. // Dose-Response;2007, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p214 

    The induction of "bystander effects" i.e. effects in cells which have not received an ionizing radiation track, is now accepted but the mechanisms are not completely clear. Bystander effects following high and low LET radiation exposure are accepted but mechanisms are still not understood. There...

  • Doses to organs and tissues from concomitant imaging in radiotherapy: a suggested framework for clinical justification. Harrison, R. M. // British Journal of Radiology;Dec2008, Vol. 81 Issue 972, p970 

    The increasing use of imaging for localization and verification in radiotherapy has raised issues concerning the justifiable doses to critical organs and tissues from concomitant exposures, particularly when extensive image-guided radiotherapy is indicated. Doses at positions remote from the...

  • Beam scanning system for a clinical pi-meson beam. Lam, G. K. Y.; Harrison, R. W.; Kornelsen, R. O.; Skarsgard, L. D. // Review of Scientific Instruments;Mar86, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p329 

    A beam delivery system for large uniform dose fields suitable for cancer radiotherapy has been constructed for the TRIUMF pion treatment facility using discrete step beam scanning in three dimensions. The patient on a couch is scanned laterally relative to a pencil beam in a raster fashion. At...

  • The Healthy Worker Effect and Nuclear Industry Workers. Fornalski, Krzysztof W.; Dobrzyński, Ludwik // Dose-Response;2010, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p125 

    The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose-effect relationship has been consistently used by most radiation epidemiologists to estimate cancer mortality risk. The large scattering of data by International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC (Vrijheid et al. 2007; Therry-Chef et al. 2007; Cardis et al....

  • Low-Dose Cancer Risk Modeling Must Recognize Up-Regulation of Protection. Feinendegen, Ludwig E.; Pollycove, Myron; Neumann, Ronald D. // Dose-Response;2010, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p227 

    Ionizing radiation primarily perturbs the basic molecular level proportional to dose, with potential damage propagation to higher levels: cells, tissues, organs, and whole body. There are three types of defenses against damage propagation. These operate deterministically and below a certain...

  • The Dose Window for Radiation-Induced Protective Adaptive Responses. Mitchel, Ronald E. J. // Dose-Response;2010, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p192 

    Adaptive responses to low doses of low LET radiation occur in all organisms thus far examined, from single cell lower eukaryotes to mammals. These responses reduce the deleterious consequences of DNA damaging events, including radiation-induced or spontaneous cancer and non-cancer diseases in...

  • Special Issue Introduction. Scott, Bobby R. // Dose-Response;2010, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p122 

    No abstract available.

  • Single-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy can provide dose distributions equivalent to fixed-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostatic irradiation with seminal vesicle and/or lymph node involvement. Fontenot, J. D.; King, M. L.; Johnson, S. A.; Wood, C. G.; Price, M. J.; Lo, K. K. // British Journal of Radiology;Mar2012, Vol. 85 Issue 1011, p231 

    Objectives: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is becoming an increasingly utilised modality for treating a variety of anatomical sites. However, the efficacy of single-arc VMAT to treat prostate cancer suspicious for extraprostatic extension was heretofore unknown. In this work, we report...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics