A Context for Considering Variable Annuities with Living Benefit Riders

Robinson, John H.
May 2008
Journal of Financial Planning;May2008, Vol. 21 Issue 5, p56
Academic Journal
• This paper provides an objective framework for helping financial advisors assess the merits of variable annuities with living benefit riders. The first part introduces advisors to the current state of academic research on the subject. The second part provides a context for evaluating a variable annuity with a popular guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit (GLWB) rider if such a product had been available for purchase before two historical "worst case" market scenarios. • The academic community is increasingly accepting of the concept of living benefit riders as a tool for helping retirees insure portfolios against sequence-of-returns risk and longevity risk. • The irrevocability and low internal rates of return of immediate annuities have likely been barriers to their acceptance. Greater flexibility, higher potential returns, and revocability may make variable annuities with GLWB riders a superior alternative to immediate annuity contracts. • Back-testing of a hypothetical variable annuity with a 5 percent GLWB rider indicates that the 1973-1974 bear market was not long enough or severe enough to force the insurer to meet its guaranteed income obligations through reserves. But the 2000-2002 bear market data suggest that insurance carriers do indeed take on a degree of investment risk in return for the rider premiums they collect. • The high expenses of variable annuities significantly moderate sub-account performance relative to comparable lower-cost mutual funds, and may lead some readers to conclude that mutual funds are a superior planning option. Alternatively, other advisors may find value in the security they provide during bear market nadirs. This peace of mind may help investors avoid panic selling, remain appropriately weighted in equities, and remain disciplined in their allocation decisions.


Related Articles

  • Why We Count on Model Portfolios.  // Financial Planning;Apr2005, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p23 

    Explains the use of model-based portfolios in financial planning. Limitations of the use of portfolios based on risk and reward parameters; Advantages of model portfolios for financial planners; Factors to be considered in assessing financial risks.

  • Reader Spotcheck.  // Journal of Financial Planning;Apr2000, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p33 

    This article presents the result of the survey conducted by the periodical on various financial planning issues in the U.S. A statistics reveal that majority of financial planning practitioners failed to take formal steps to determine the value of their practice. Majority of consumers believe...

  • Corrupted Investment Solutions. Jahnke, William // Journal of Financial Planning;Oct2004, Vol. 17 Issue 10, p26 

    This article discusses various strategies and trends in the field of investment portfolio management in the U.S. as of October 1, 2004. For all the hoopla in the profession about managing investment portfolios to meet client objectives, this is one of the weakest areas in practice. Finding the...

  • Exploring 2 Stubborn Investment Issues. Warschauer, Thomas // Journal of Financial Planning;Jun2015, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p22 

    The article discusses factors that financial planners should consider when recommending portfolios to clients. Topics covered include segregation of a client's assets by goal, pros and cons of funding client goals simultaneously or sequentially, and the need for planners to incorporate...

  • Asset allocation: a must. Roberts, Stephen // Money Management;2/16/2006, Vol. 20 Issue 5, p14 

    The article explains the importance of asset allocation. It cites some forecasts for asset class returns that will help Australian clients appreciate asset allocation. The outlook for the next decade includes likely moderation of the unusually strong returns on growth assets, average cash...

  • The Irrational Adviser. Horwitz, Michael B. // Financial Planning;May2004, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p85 

    Recognizes the irrational beliefs of financial advisers in the financial planning practice. Vulnerability of advisers to self-doubts; Problem with the belief of advisers to gain approval from all clients; Competence of advisers.

  • FundsNetwork sharpens portfolio tools. Shaw, Sam // Money Marketing;1/26/2006, p22 

    The article reports on the changes being made by Fidelity FundsNetwork to its portfolio planning tools to enable advisers to create their own preferred funds' panels. Under the changes, advisers can set up model portfolios covering different risk profiles that can be used across multiple clients.

  • A modern take on an old portfolio theory. Bland, Leeanne // Money Management;5/12/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 16, p26 

    The article presents information about the modern portfolio theory (MPT) and its comparison with the old portfolio theory. In the U.S. "Journal of Financial Planning," journalist Bill Jahnke puts forward a summation of post modern portfolio theory. Economic consultant and author Peter Bernstein...

  • Multi-manager investments to grow in China. Lau, John // Asian Investor;Dec2008, p32 

    The article discusses the manager-of-managers and fund-of-funds concepts. Multi-manager investment products are established on the belief that not all money managers are good in all markets. Multi-manager products are aimed to spread investment money. Manager of managers may be responsible for...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics