TITLE

With the ACLU All Things Are Possible

AUTHOR(S)
Goode, Stephen
PUB. DATE
June 2000
SOURCE
Insight on the News;06/12/2000, Vol. 16 Issue 22, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Offers a look at the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) against Ohio's state motto. Overview of the decision of the court; Bible quotation from Saint Matthew; Parody against ACLU.
ACCESSION #
3191168

 

Related Articles

  • DeWeese Decalogue Display DERAILED: Appeals Court Rules Against Ohio Judge's Latest Commandments Caper. Boston, Rob // Church & State;Mar2011, Vol. 64 Issue 3, p14 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Ohio filed a complaint against Judge James DeWeese of Richland County, alleging DeWeese of promoting his personal belief in his courtroom. It says that this is the second time DeWeese was sued by ACLU for the...

  • TERRORISM.  // International Law Update;Jun2007, Vol. 13, p117 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) found that the plaintiffs in a case against the National Security Agency's (NSA) program for intercepting overseas communications do not have standing to bring a lawsuit. The plaintiffs against the program known as the Terrorist...

  • Sixth Circuit strikes down affirmative action. Czurak, David // Grand Rapids Business Journal;12/3/2012, Vol. 30 Issue 49, p14 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit to overturn the prohibition on affirmative action in college admissions. Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette is appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the initiative based on the Michigan Civil Rights...

  • Failure to Sign Release Agreement Inadequate Reason to Deny Benefits.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;May2007, Vol. 41 Issue 5, p5 

    The article looks at a court case decision wherein the defendant refused severance benefits to the plaintiff when the latter failed to signed a release agreement. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth District reviews the regulation that lack of a signed release form is insufficient reason for...

  • Plaintiffs Not Entitled to Plan Surplus Without Evidence of Plan Termination.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Nov2007, Vol. 41 Issue 11, p9 

    The article discusses the court case Jensen et al v. Moore Wallace North America Inc. et al, filed in August 21, 2007. The case involves present and former participants of a benefit pension plan established by the defendant in 1947. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit seeking to recover a US$200...

  • Plaintiffs Present Insufficient Evidence That Plant Was Closed to Interfere With Retirement Benefits.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Jun2009, Vol. 43 Issue 6, p8 

    The article discusses a court case wherein plaintiff filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit after the district court granted summary judgement to the defendants and dismissed the plaintiff's motion for relief from judgement based on new evidence. The plaintiff alleged...

  • Plaintiff Entitled to Severance When Purchaser of His Division Does Not Offer Comparable Benefits.  // Benefits & Compensation Digest;Aug2006, Vol. 43 Issue 8, Special section p4 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverses a district court and holds a company wrongfully denied a former employee's claim for severance benefits after the company that purchased his division failed to offer him benefits comparable to those he received...

  • Company's Refusal to Bridge Service Is Not Arbitrary and Capricious.  // Benefits & Compensation Digest;Aug2006, Vol. 43 Issue 8, Special section p10 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverses a district court determination and holds a company's refusal to bridge the service of an employee who left the company but later returned to employment for purposes of his eligibility for certain health and welfare...

  • Defendants Jointly Liable for Unpaid Contributions to Pension Plan.  // Benefits & Compensation Digest;Dec2010, Vol. 47 Issue 12, p45 

    The article discusses a court case where the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixty Circuit affirmed a district court's decision that an individual and two related employers were liable for delinquent contributions to a multiemployer pension plan. Plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics