April 2008
Utility Week;4/4/2008, Vol. 28 Issue 22, p13
Trade Publication
The article states that changes in the reporting process for companies abstracting water should streamline the system and make it more consistent, according to the British Environment Agency. Some large abstractors would be required to report more frequently, but for many the frequency would fall and overall the amount of data submitted would be 40 per cent lower. A spokesman said a new online reporting system would also make reporting simpler and remove the need to maintain paper records.


Related Articles

  • Agency slammed for not giving guidance. Ockenden, Karma // Utility Week;10/25/2002, Vol. 18 Issue 17, p6 

    Reports on the accusations by the water industry against Great Britain's Environment Agency of insufficient long-term planning. Failure provide clear and accurate water quality standards; Failure to tackle climate change; Issues that the Environment Agency need to clarify.

  • Energy companies beat water in CRC league table.  // Utility Week;3/1/2013, p5 

    The article reports on the data released by Great Britain's Environment Agency which shows that energy companies have outperformed water companies in the carbon reduction commitment (CRC) league table.

  • Oestrogen debate must be full-blown.  // Utility Week;4/5/2002, Vol. 17 Issue 14, p6 

    Reports that the water industry has called for the British government to address the issue of oestrogens in sewage effluent. Details of a risk management strategy suggested by the British Environment Agency for the issue; Debate about the funding of programs addressing the issue.

  • Green watchdog queries economic leakage levels.  // Utility Week;8/16/2002, Vol. 18 Issue 9, p6 

    Reports that the Great Britain Environment Agency questioned the viability of continuing use economics of as the basis for setting water company leakage targets. Approach it recommended to calculate economic levels.

  • Four more firms 'seriously stressed'.  // Utility Week;11/9/2012, p9 

    The article reports on the proposal by the Great Britain Environment Agency to change the way it determines the level of water stress in England and Wales by shifting four water companies into the serious category.

  • VIEWPOINT. Ward, Peter // WET News: Water & Effluent Treatment News;Dec2008/Jan2009, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p7 

    The author calls for supporting the Environment Agency's Monitoring Certification Scheme (MCERTS) in Great Britain. He explains that the purpose of MCERTS is to identify and help mitigate environmental damage. He says that like any other scheme, MCERTS needs time and commitment. He also mentions...

  • Agency: green goals must be paid for.  // Utility Week;1/24/2003, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p8 

    Cites the concern of the Environment Agency of Great Britain that water companies may not be able to maintain environmental progress after the next price review. Focus on the water environment in the south of England; Preparations for the Water Framework Directive.

  • Water pollution cases down. Andrews, Annabel // Utility Week;11/13/2009, Vol. 31 Issue 20, p8 

    The article addresses the decline of the number of pollution incidents caused by water firms in England and Wales in 2008. According to figures released by the British Environment Agency, the total water company pollution incidents for 2008 were 2,012. Environment Agency Chief Executive Paul...

  • Pastures new. Ockenden, Karma // Utility Week;7/2/2004, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p16 

    Focuses on the impact of the plan of the British government to reconstruct the way diffuse pollution from agriculture is handled in water companies. Implications of the proposal for catchment sensitive farming; Approaches in dealing with diffuse pollution according to the National Farmers...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics