TITLE

Better deal for mothers

AUTHOR(S)
Backhouse, Wendy
PUB. DATE
May 2000
SOURCE
Cabinet Maker;05/19/2000, Issue 5188, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Stresses that a woman's protection against pregnancy related dismissal stretches from the start of pregnancy to the end of maternity leave.
ACCESSION #
3187120

 

Related Articles

  • Bad timing: Woman who was about to be fired announces that she's pregnant.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;1/31/2014, Vol. 9 Issue 209, p4 

    The article discusses the U.S. District court case Rivas v. Fashion Institute of Technology in which a staffer sued her company for firing her due to pregnancy and the court ruled in favor of staffers stating that the claim of being underperformer seem suspicious and sent the case to jury.

  • Woman says NY synagogue fired her for being pregnant at her wedding.  // Jewish Telegraphic Agency: 1922 to present;9/24/2015, p1 

    (JTA) -- The former program director of the oldest Jewish congregation in America said she was fired because she was pregnant at the time of her wedding.

  • legal news for supervisors.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;5/9/2014, Vol. 9 Issue 216, p3 

    The article offers news briefs in the U.S. 2014 including a new law in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on pregnant workers, the use of apology in defusing a lawsuit, and the court ruling noting that a worker will not be terminated merely for attractiveness.

  • Dismissal for pregnancy--EC style.  // Accountancy;Sep94, Vol. 114 Issue 1213, p106 

    The article discusses a case concerning dismissal for pregnancy in the European Community. The Court of Justice of the European Communities has decided that the dismissal of a pregnant women who had been recruited for an indefinite period could not be justified by the fact that she was prevented...

  • Supervisor tells pregnant staffer that her 'big belly' will get in the way at work.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;2/28/2014, Vol. 9 Issue 211, p1 

    The article discusses a U.S. court case where a female worker filed a suit against the company she worked for claiming that she was terminated because of her pregnancy. It notes that the employee has gotten a note from the doctor allowing her to continue her work as long as she did not lift over...

  • RADNI ODNOSI. Gliha, Rihard // Sigurnost;2013, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p265 

    No abstract available.

  • Firing of Pregnant Employee Brings Multiple Awards.  // Labor Law Journal;Dec87, Vol. 38 Issue 12, p775 

    This article reports on the decision of a Minnesota federal district court on the Gammon versus Precision Engineering Co. case. An employee discharged after she left work to have a baby was entitled to a triple backpay award, compensation for medical expenses that should have been covered by her...

  • CASE ROUND-UP.  // Personnel Today;5/16/2006, p21 

    The article presents information on two legal cases, Brocklebank v. Silveira and CHRIS Project v. Lara Hutt of Great Britain's Employment Appeal Tribunal. In the first case, the plaintiff's complaint of unlawful sex discrimination was upheld and Brocklebank and Machado were ordered to pay...

  • Pregnancy dismissals and fixed-term contracts.  // Accountancy;Jan2002, Vol. 129 Issue 1301, p88 

    The article focuses on the decision by the European Court of Justice in the case Tele Danmark A/S versus Handels-NG Kontorfunkcionaerernes. The ruling stipulates that the dismissal of a woman employed on a fixed-term contract who knew about her pregnant condition when she was recruited and would...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics