Lose Customers, Retain Marketing Rights

Spangler, Todd; Haugsted, Linda
April 2008
Multichannel News;4/21/2008, Vol. 29 Issue 16, p3
The article offers information on the complaint filed against Verizon. It states that Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Bright House Networks lodged a complaint against Verizon in February 2008, claiming that the company's practices violate a section of the Communications Act of 1934. The Federal Communications Commission ruled that Verizon can continue to use information reaped from cable operators who submit a user's number away from the company in order to try and hold customers.


Related Articles

  • Bright House Complains About Verizon Cut. Haugsted, Linda // Multichannel News;4/18/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 16, p16 

    Reports on a complaint filed by Bright House Networks against Verizon Communications Inc. for cutting its fiber-optic plant and disrupting its services in April 2005. Arguments raised by Verizon regarding the complaint; Explanation of Verizon regarding the fiber cut accident; Deterrent to...

  • FCC tallies fewer wireless complaints.  // RCR Wireless News;2/27/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 9, p15 

    The article reports that complaints filed by mobile telephone subscribers at the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) dropped in the fourth quarter of 2005 compared with the previous quarter. The FCC said wireless complaints decreased from 6,873 in the third quarter to 4,956 in the...

  • Verizon challenges FCC's view on biennial reviews. Weaver, Heather Forsgren // RCR Wireless News;12/22/2003, Vol. 22 Issue 51/52, p11 

    Reports on the opposition of Verizon Communications Inc. to the view of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) concerning the biennial review defined by the U.S. Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 as of December 2003. Arguments raised by Verizon; Delegation of the...

  • Telecoms Attack FCC Broadband Regulations, SkyTerra Acquisition. Hill, Jeffrey // Satellite News;3/31/2010, Vol. 33 Issue 13, p2 

    The article presents information on the stand of Google Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and AT&T against certain U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations involving the mobile satellite industry. They complained about the relaxing requirements on satellite providers to deliver...

  • In the Courts:.  // CableFAX Daily;6/30/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 127, p1 

    Presents update on court cases related to the U.S. cable television industry as of June 2006. Lawsuit filed by Verizon against Montgomery County, Maryland for illegal cable franchising process and demands; Rejection by the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals of a petition to postpone the...

  • NO NEUTRALITY ON NET. Johnson, Ted // Daily Variety;10/15/2012, Vol. 317 Issue 11, p12 

    The article reports that Verizon has challenged the authority of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to impose the rules which prohibit fixed Internet providers from blocking lawful content, in a lawsuit.

  • CIRCUITS. Maleske, Melissa // InsideCounsel;Jul2011, Vol. 22 Issue 235, p65 

    The article describes a case wherein the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia (D.C.) dismissed the suit filed by Verizon against the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on the basis that it was filed prematurely. In its ruling, the D.C. Circuit cited that Verizon's suit against the...

  • FCC: Verizon didn't violate privacy laws. Sarkar, Dibya // Buffalo Law Journal;4/17/2008, Vol. 80 Issue 31, p1 

    The article reports on the determination of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) enforcement bureau that Verizon Communications Inc. has not violated consumer-privacy laws for trying to retain customers. Comcast Corp., Time Warner Cable Inc. and Bright House Networks filed a...

  • BELL ATLANTIC TELEPHONE COS. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION. Chen, Ernest H. // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;2001, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p369 

    Focuses on the case of Bell Atlantic Telephone Cos. versus the Federal Communications Commission in the United States. History of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Discussion of the court decision; Inclusion of Internet Service Provider-bound traffic in reciprocal compensation obligation;...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics