TITLE

Anterior Transposition Compared with Simple Decompression for Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

AUTHOR(S)
Zlowodzki, Michael; Chan, Simon; Bhandari, Mohit; Kalliainen, Loree; Schubert, Warren
PUB. DATE
December 2007
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Dec2007, Vol. 89-A Issue 12, p2591
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: There is currently no consensus on the optimal operative treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome. The objective of this meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials was to evaluate the efficacy of simple decompression compared with that of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in the treatment of this condition. Methods: Multiple databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials on the outcome of operative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome in patients who had not previously sustained trauma or undergone a surgical procedure involving the elbow. Two reviewers abstracted baseline characteristics, clinical scores, and motor nerve- conduction velocities independently. Data were pooled across studies, standard mean differences in effect sizes weighted by study sample size were calculated, and heterogeneity across studies was assessed. Results: We identified four randomized, controlled trials comparing simple decompression with anterior ulnar nerve transposition (two submuscular and two subcutaneous). In three studies that included a total of 261 patients, a clinical scoring system was used as the primary clinical outcome. There were no significant differences between simple decompression and anterior transposition in terms of the clinical scores in those studies (standard mean difference in effect size = -0.04 [95% confidence interval = -0.36 to 0.28], p = 0.81). We did not find significant heterogeneity across these studies (I² = 34.2%, p = 0.22). Two reports, on a total of 100 patients, presented postoperative motor nerve-conduction velocities; they showed no significant differences between the procedures (standard mean difference in effect size = 0.24 [95% confidence interval -0.15 to 0.63] in favor of simple decompression, p=0.23; I²=0%, p=09) Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that there is no difference in motor nerve-conduction velocities or clinical outcome scores between simple decompression and ulnar nerve transposition for the treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow in patients with no prior traumatic injuries or surgical procedures involving the affected elbow. Confidence intervals around the points of estimate were narrow, which probably exclude the possibility of clinically meaningful differences. These data suggest that simple decompression of the ulnar nerve is a reasonable alternative to anterior transposition for the surgical management of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.
ACCESSION #
31710452

 

Related Articles

  • Distal Humeral Fractures in Adults. Nauth, Aaron; McKee, Michael D.; Ristevski, Bill; Hall, Jeremy; Schemitsch, Emil H. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;4/6/2011, Vol. 93-A Issue 7, p686 

    The article focuses on the distal humeral fractures particularly in adults. It discusses the fracture's classifications which includes the extra, partial, and complete articular fractures based on the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) or Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO)...

  • Randomized Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery: One Step Closer. Bhandari, Mohit; Tornetta III, Paul; Schemitsch, Emil H. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;7/18/2012 Supp1, Vol. 94-A, p1 

    An introduction is presented in which the editors discusses various reports within the issue on topics related to randomized trials in orthopaedic surgery.

  • The intra-articular use of ropivacaine for the control of post knee arthroscopy pain. Samoladas, Efthimios P.; Chalidis, Byron; Fotiadis, Hlias; Terzidis, Ioanis; Ntobas, Thomas; Koimtzis, Miltos // Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Research;2006, Vol. 1, p17 

    Aims: The purpose of this prospective randomised study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and the appropriate dose of the ropivacaine in the control of post-knee arthroscopy pain. Methods: We randomised 60 patients in two groups to receive 10 ml/7.5 mg/ml ropivacaine (Group B) or 20 ml/7.5...

  • Orthopaedic Trial Networks. Rangan, Amar; Brealey, Stephen; Carr, Andrew // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;7/18/2012 Supp1, Vol. 94-A, p97 

    Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the most robust design for evaluating health care interventions. However, it is difficult to acquire funding for RCTs, and they are complex to set up. Threats to their successful conduct and impact on clinical practice, particularly in surgical...

  • Anterior Transposition Compared with Simple Decompression for Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Zlowodzki, Michael; Chan, Simon; Bhandari, Mohit; Kalliainen, Loree; Schubert, Warren // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Dec2007, Vol. 89-A Issue 12, p2591 

    Background: There is currently no consensus on the optimal operative treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome. The objective of this meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials was to evaluate the efficacy of simple decompression compared with that of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in...

  • Emerging Designs in Orthopaedics: Expertise-Based Randomized Controlled Trials. Scholtes, Vanessa A.; Nijman, Thomas H.; van Beers, Loes; Devereaux, P. J.; Poolman, Rudolf W. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;7/18/2012 Supp1, Vol. 94-A, p24 

    In this article, we discuss the limitations of conventional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the surgical field. Surgeons are often believers in certain surgical techniques and therefore can be reluctant to learn new interventions. In expertise-based trials, the patients are randomized to...

  • Correction accuracy and collateral laxity in open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. A one-year randomised controlled study. Gaasbeek, Robert; Nicolaas, Loes; Rijnberg, Willard; Loon, Corne; Kampen, Albert // International Orthopaedics;Feb2010, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p201 

    In a randomised clinical trial in 50 patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee, the clinical results of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) according to the open wedge osteotomy (OWO) and closed wedge osteotomy (CWO) were compared. In both groups locked plate...

  • Sutures versus staples for wound closure in orthopaedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Shantz, Jesse A.; Vernon, James; Leiter, Jeff; Morshed, Saam; Stranges, Gregory // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2012, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p89 

    Background: A recently published meta-analysis comparing metallic staples to sutures in orthopaedic procedures revealed three fold increase in risk for infection in stapled wounds. The studies included in the meta-analysis are at risk of bias due to experimental design limitations. A large...

  • A comparison of thoracic spinal anesthesia with low-dose isobaric and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Imbelloni, Luiz Eduardo; Gouveia, Marildo A. // Anesthesia: Essays & Researches;Jan-Apr2014, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p26 

    Background: The thoracic spinal anesthesia was first described in 1909 and recently revised for various surgical procedures. This is a prospective study aims to evaluate the parameters of the thoracic spinal anesthesia (latency, motor block and paresthesia), the incidence of cardiovascular...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics