Immediate Mobilization Compared with Conventional Immobilization for the Impacted Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humeral Fracture

Lefevre-Colau, M. M.; Babinet, A.; Fayad, F.; Fermanian, J.; Anract, P.; Roren, A.; Kansao, J.; Revel, M.; Poiraudeau, S.
December 2007
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Dec2007, Vol. 89-A Issue 12, p2582
Academic Journal
Background: There have been few randomized controlled trials evaluating nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. To investigate shortening the period of dependence, we assessed the feasibility and efficacy of early mobilization of the shoulder (within three days after the fracture) in comparison with those of conventional three-week immobilization followed by physiotherapy. Methods: We randomly assigned seventy-four patients with an impacted proximal humeral fracture to receive early passive mobilization or conventional treatment. The primary outcome was the overall shoulder functional status (as measured with the Constant score) at three months. The secondary outcomes were the Constant score at six weeks and at six months, the change in pain (on a visual analog scale), and the active and passive range of motion. Results: At three months and at six weeks, the early mobilization group had a significantly better Constant score than did the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 9.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 17.8] [p = 0.02] and 10.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 18.1] [p = 0.02], respectively) and better active mobility in forward elevation (between-group difference, 12.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 22.4] [p = 0.02] and 28.1 [95% confidence interval, 7.1 to 49.1] [p = 0.01], respectively). At three months, the early mobilization group had significantly reduced pain compared with the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 15.7 [95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 30.8] [p = 0.04]). No complications in displacement or nonhealing were noted. Conclusions: Early mobilization for impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fractures is safe and is more effective for quickly restoring the physical capability and performance of the injured arm than is conventional immobilization followed by physiotherapy.


Related Articles

  • Delayed Axillary Artery Injury due to Displacement of Proximal Humeral Fracture. Khanna, Arun; Khanna, Anil; Tricker, John // Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery;2008, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p2 

    Proximal humerus fractures are commonly encountered in orthopaedic practice. They are uncommonly associated with axillary artery injuries, more rarely with delayed presentation of the same. We report an unusual of delayed axillary artery injury following proximal humerus fracture due to...

  • Lack of Benefit of Physical Therapy on Function Following Supracondylar Humeral Fracture. Schmale, Gregory A.; Mazor, Suzan; Mercer, Laina D.; Bompadre, Viviana // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;6/4/2014, Vol. 96 Issue 11, p944 

    Background: The goal of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of physical therapy in restoring function and mobility after a pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture. Methods: The study included sixty-one patients from five to twelve years of age with a supracondylar humeral fracture that was...

  • Kominutivni intraartikularni prelomi distalnog humerusa lečeni minimalnom fiksacijom- jedna od opcija za lečenje. Cvetković, Y. R.; Lešić, A. R.; Bumbaširević, M. // Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica;2008, Vol. 55 Issue 4, p61 

    Fractures of distal humerus on humen skeleton are rare and intraarticular fractions of distal part of humerus occur even less frequently, they comprise abouth 3% of fractures of humerus. However, these fractures can result in a functional deficiency of elbow joint and permanent disability. The...

  • Reconstruction after Bone Healing Problems in Humeral Shaft Fractures. Sárváry, András Mária; Feczkó, Jozsef // European Journal of Trauma;Dec2003, Vol. 29 Issue 6, p356 

    Background: Categorization and therapy of bone healing disturbances of diaphyseal humeral fractures vary in the literature. Patients and Methods: A consecutive series of 25 revisions for bone healing disturbances was reviewed retrospectively. Timing of revisions, characteristics of delayed...

  • Angular and sliding stable antegrade nailing (Targon PH) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Gradl, Georg; Dietze, Albrecht; Arndt, Dagmar; Beck, Markus; Gierer, Philip; Börsch, Tillmann; Mittlmeier, Thomas // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Dec2007, Vol. 127 Issue 10, p937 

    The optimal surgical treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures continues to be controversial. Different treatment modalities are available. Mechanical implant-related problems, however, and the preservation of the biological integrity of the humeral head remain unsolved. New implants...

  • Diaphyseal Humeral Fractures: Treatment Options. Sarmiento, Augusto; Waddell, James P.; Latta, Loren L. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Oct2001, Vol. 83-A Issue 10, p1566 

    Describes the four most commonly used treatments for diaphyseal humeral fractures. Biomechanics of fracture-healing and fracture stability; Indications for surgery; Functional bracing of humeral fractures; View that plate fixation is the best method of treatment when adequate alignment cannot...

  • Functional Bracing for the Treatment of Fractures of the Humeral Diaphysis. Sarmiento, A.; Zagorski, J.B.; Zych, G.A.; Latta, I.L.; Capps, C.A. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Apr2000, Vol. 82-A Issue 4, p478 

    Background: Nonoperatively treated fractures of the humeral diaphysis have a high rate of union with good functional results. However, there are clinical situations in which operative treatment is more appropriate, and, though interest in plate osteosynthesis has decreased, intramedullary...

  • ASK DR. LISA. Callahan, Lisa // Self;Jun2002, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p90 

    Provides information on the causes of low back pain. Epidemiology of the back condition; Correlation of stress fracture of the spine with low back pain; Physical therapy intervention.

  • Orthotic Therapy Results in Less Pain. Hasson, Matt // O&P Business News;2/1/2006, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p44 

    Focuses on the results of a study conducted by physician F.C. Öner on treatment options for abnormal occurrence (AO) type A1 and A2 compression fractures and AO type 3 burst fractures in neurologically intact patients in the U.S. as of February 2006. Inclusion of 133 patients with 158...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics