TITLE

State Action Immunity, Municipalities, and the Unique Case of Eminent Domain

AUTHOR(S)
Motto, Joseph L.
PUB. DATE
March 2008
SOURCE
Journal of Corporation Law;Spring2008, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p797
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
31633998

 

Related Articles

  • CLARIFYING THE STATE ACTION AND NOERR EXEMPTIONS. Muris, Timothy J. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2004, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p443 

    Discusses clarifications of the U.S. state action and Noerr-Perrington doctrine exemptions in March 2004. Issues with regard to the Noerr doctrine; Interpretation of the clear articulation requirement; Elaboration of the standards for the active supervision requirement; Consideration on the...

  • Deliberate Indifference Under � 1983: Do the Courts Really Care? Justiss, Gavin // Review of Litigation;Summer2009, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p953 

    The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeal Fifth Circuit's application of the deliberate indifference standard in two recent Fifth Circuit decisions which both deal with a claim in Section 1983. It also elaborates the procedural and factual history of two issues concerning the standards such...

  • New Life for the Compulsion Requirement of the State Action Doctrine after United States v. Southern Motor Carries Rate Conference, Inc. Friedrichsen, Timothy M. // Journal of Corporation Law;Spring84, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p626 

    This article examines the effect of the Southern Motor Carriers decision on the state action doctrine. First, the development of the state action doctrine is discussed. Second, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Southern Motor Carriers is presented. Third, the reasoning of Southern...

  • Corporate Accountability to Human Rights: The Case of the Gaza Strip. Weiss, Dana; Shamir, Ronen // Harvard Human Rights Journal;Summer2011, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p154 

    The article analyzes the commercial activity of Israeli corporations operating in the Palestinian Gaza Strip and discusses their human rights obligations. The lack of attention to the liabilities of corporations by both Israeli courts and human rights organizations is noted. Case studies...

  • NOT IN MY FRONT YARD: FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND STATE ACTION IN NEW YORK CITY'S PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLIC SPACES. Tower, Stephen // Journal of Law & Policy;2013, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p433 

    The article focuses on the development of the incentive zoning scheme of the privately owned public spaces in New York City. Topics discussed include laws governing the regulation of the privately owned public spaces, action of the state related to the private entities and mitigation of the...

  • Bringing in the State: Toward a Constitutional Duty to Protect from Mob Violence. Kuo, Susan S. // Indiana Law Journal;Winter2004, Vol. 79 Issue 1, p177 

    Focuses on the U.S. governmental accountability to its citizens for riot violence pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Discussion of the common law underpinnings of the U.S. governmental duty to protect its citizens from mob violence; Explanation of the current law as...

  • When government goes too far. Cantor, Martin // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);4/7/2006, Vol. 53 Issue 15, p10A 

    The article comments on the separate eminent domain cases in Connecticut and Long Island, New York. Both of these cases are connected to issues on rights to personal property and public interest. The Connecticut case refers to the issue on the state government's seizing of properties from the...

  • SOUND OFF. Harden, Joanne // NMPRO - Nursery Management & Production;Sep2005, Vol. 21 Issue 9, p24 

    Comments on the use of eminent domain for private development in the United States. Supreme Court ruling that allowed taking private property for other private development; Author's experience with regards to eminent domain issue.

  • Eminent domain ruling ripples through country. Solnik, Claude // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);8/19/2005, Vol. 52 Issue 34, p6B 

    Reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the use of eminent domain for private development. Conditions under the eminent domain; Purpose of the constitutional amendment proposed by different states; Reaction of several lawyers about the decision of the court.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics