Harding-Hill, Rebecca
February 2008
People Management;2/21/2008, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p21
The article discusses several cases on retiring non-employees. It highlights that the Seldon versus Clarkson Wright and Jakes and Hampton versus The Lord Chancellor cases in Great Britain show what employers have to do to justify age discriminatory treatment. It explains that to establish objective justification, an organization has to show that the discriminatory treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim and that preserving a congenial culture is unlikely to be accepted as justification in more mainstream corporate organizations.


Related Articles

  • when is a dinosaur just a dinosaur? ambiguity and employment law. Zachary, Mary-Kathryn // Supervision;Jun2008, Vol. 69 Issue 6, p22 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff argued that in his lawsuit that he was fired, or in the alternative, was the victim of a constructive discharge by the company, motivated by unlawful age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The appellate court...

  • Management 101: Five legal lessons your supervisors must learn.  // HR Specialist: Florida Employment Law;Jun2010, Vol. 5 Issue 6, p4 

    The article discusses various court cases involving employment law violations. The court cases discussed include those which involve age discrimination, national origin discrimination, and sexual harassment through web pornography. Lessons that supervisors must learn from each of the court cases...

  • A Twenty-Year History and Review of the ADEA. Ruegger, Durwood // Labor Law Journal;Jan89, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p31 

    The article examines the reported Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) court decisions and to determine the effect that the Act has had upon equal employment opportunities for the older worker in the United States. The article suggests that although the ADEA requires the federal courts to...

  • Legal Q&A…: Heyday's age discrimination case.  // Personnel Today;1/23/2007, p18 

    The article presents questions and answers related to the Heyday age discrimination case in Great Britain. One person asks on the legal background behind the Heyday case. Another questions the possible challenges that could be argued against the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations. A reader...

  • The retirement row hots up but questions remain.  // Employers Law;Nov2007, p5 

    The article analyzes the effects of the decision on the first major age discrimination case Bloxham versus Freshfields. It looks on whether the decision will make it easier for employers to justify difference of treatment on the grounds of age. However, Ranjit Dhindsa, an employment partner at...

  • employment law timetable. Gallagher, Kate; Wigham, Ross // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2005, p5 

    Presents an update on employment law in Great Britain as of July 2005. Schedule set by the Department of Trade and Industry for releasing the draft regulations and consultation paper on Age Discrimination in Employment and Vocational Training; Availability of the Transfer of Undertakings...

  • labor-management relations.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep93, Vol. 44 Issue 9, p589 

    Presents news briefs on industrial relations in the U.S. as of September 1993. Decision on the race discrimination claim filed by an African American supervisor in the Supreme Court; Provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act related to injury claims; Revision of the union...

  • LEGAL CHECKLIST.  // People Management;5/1/2008, Vol. 14 Issue 9, p37 

    The article discusses several court cases related to labor and employment in Great Britain. The case Thomas-James and others versus Cornwall County Council considered whether there had been a transfer under Transfer of Undertakings Protection of Employment (TUPE) 2006 after a re-tendering or...

  • Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Amicus Curiae. Buscemi, Peter // Supreme Court Debates;Mar2005, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p93 

    The article reports that the disparate impact theory, first recognized in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971), a race discrimination case under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, does not apply to age discrimination claims. When the U.S. Congress passed Title VII, it expressly recognized...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics