Judges Evaluate CALEA Provisions

Carlson, Caron
May 2000
Wireless Week;05/22/2000, Vol. 6 Issue 21, p1
Trade Publication
Reports on the judicial evaluation of the technical nature of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement (CALEA) in the United States (U.S.). Concerns over the privacy and cost-effectiveness of provisions in CALEA; Charges against the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.


Related Articles

  • Courts continue to clobber FCC. Toth, Victor J. // Business Communications Review;Aug94, Vol. 24 Issue 8, p46 

    Focuses on the trials and litigations against the US Federal Communications Commission. Tariff requirements; Local access competition; Sensitivity to the constraints of the Communications Act.

  • Affirmative-action watch. Williams, S. // Black Enterprise;Sep90, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p20 

    Comments on a recent US Supreme Court ruling that upheld the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) affirmative-action policies. Background of the case; Implications.

  • Off to court. Cooper, Lane F. // Telephony;09/22/97, Vol. 233 Issue 12, p20 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by several United States legislators against the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) after FCC rejected Ameritech Corp.'s application to offer long-distance service in Michigan. Background of the case; Description of the Total Element Long Run Increment Costs.

  • High court rejects request to stop stay. Wayne, Debra // RCR;11/18/96, Vol. 15 Issue 46, p1 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court rejected any further appeal to vacate a stay of certain interconnection and local competition rules adopted by the Federal Communications Commision(FCC), in August 1996. Reference to the court rejecting a petition for such action filed by the...

  • Industry prepares portability argument for court. Weaver, Heather Forsgren // RCR;09/21/98, Vol. 17 Issue 38, p52 

    Reports that the wireless industry is preparing for arguments against the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) before a federal appeals court, regarding claims of improper enactment of rules requiring wireless number portability which should be reversed. Court in which the...

  • Untitled. Jessell, Harry A. // Broadcasting & Cable;5/24/93, Vol. 123 Issue 21, p68 

    Reports on the refusal of United States District Court Judge Royce Lamberth to block the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from enforcing its indecency rules. Arguments that the agency's fining procedure violates broadcaster's First Amendment rights; Disqualification of parties that...

  • Untitled. Jessell, Harry A. // Broadcasting & Cable;5/24/93, Vol. 123 Issue 21, p68 

    Reports on the ruling of United States Court of Federal Claims Judge Robert Hodges that the Portals office complex in Southwest Washington may have been unfairly treated in its bid to win a lease to house the Federal Communications Commission. Complaint against the General Services...

  • Untitled. Jessell, Harry A. // Broadcasting & Cable;5/24/93, Vol. 123 Issue 21, p68 

    Reports on the protest registered by Federal Communications Commissioner Andrew Barrett against the commission's denial of the request for an extension of the effective date of the new cable regulations. Failure to explain the denial; Companies' need for time to assess the impact of the...

  • Settlement: FCC's newest strategy to address indecency? Ballard, Michelle M.; Rivera-Sanchez, Milagros // Communications & the Law;Dec96, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p1 

    Examines the rationale used by the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in settling its cases against Evergreen Media and Infinity Broadcasting, regarding indecent broadcasting over the airwaves. When the cases against both were settled; Analysis of why the FCC departed from...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics