TITLE

The Strange, Ironic Career of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 1965-2007

AUTHOR(S)
Kousser, J. Morgan
PUB. DATE
March 2008
SOURCE
Texas Law Review;Mar2008, Vol. 86 Issue 4, p667
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Strange events and ironic conjunctions pervade the narrative of the renewal of provisions of the Voting Rights Act 2005-2006. Never has the radical, still-controversial Act been treated in such hushed, reverential tones, and never has its" discussion been so blatantly manipulated for immediate partisan advantage. Never have there been so many proposals for comprehensive changes when the temporary parts of the Act have come up for renewal and never has there been less serious debate about the Act in committees and on the floor of Congress. Never has support for the Act in Congress and the country seemed so universal and never has its constitutional future before the Supreme Court seemed so tenuous. This Article shows that the strange, ironic nature of the recent consideration of the Voting Rights Act is not unusual but rather that it is ,typical of the history of the most controversial provision of the Act, Section 5, which requires that all changes in election laws in "covered jurisdictions, " chiefly in the Deep South, be submitted to the Justice Department or the District of Columbia District Court for "preclearance" before they are allowed to go into effect. In its early years, Section 5 was largely ignored by state and local governments, and the Justice Department was too disorganized to police it, anyway. After receiving a judicial blessing from the Supreme Court, Section 5 was for the first time vigorously enforced by the Nixon Administration, which had opposed its effective continuation, and the Carter Administration, the first administration headed by a president from the Deep South since before the Civil War. Two Supreme Court decisions in 1976 and 1980 that threatened to sap the Act's vigor instead stimulated civil rights activists to mount a campaign for amendments that overwhelmed the Reagan Administration and led to the largest increase in minority elected officials since the first years of the post-Civil War Reconstruction. But no sooner had the promise of the Act finally been fulfilled than the Supreme Court--through strained interpretations of the Act's intentions and, even more ironically, through the use of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to hamper, instead of to protect, minority political rights--stripped the Act of much of its power. By 2006, the Act's iconic status insured its persistence, but the fears of its staunchest proponents and the barely hidden antipathy of many members of the dominant political party prevented amendments that might have increased its chances to pass muster with the Roberts Court. Eight days after President George W. Bush signed the law, Gregory Coleman, a Texas lawyer with strong ties to the Republican Party, filed a serious challenge to the constitutionality of Section 5. The strange career continues. Analyzing the complete history of Section 5 and emphasizing the story's ironic elements and shifting course yield lessons that may be useful in the continuing struggle to protect the political rights of minorities.
ACCESSION #
31447149

 

Related Articles

  • Key Section of the Voting Rights Act Ruled Unconstitutional Filed in Breaking News on June 25, 2013.  // Journal of Blacks in Higher Education (BruCon Publishing Co.);06/27/2013, p1 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Shelby County v. Holder wherein the Supreme Court has ruled that a formula to determine local jurisdictions which requires preclearing of any election law changes with the U.S. Justice Department is unconstitutional. It informs that no...

  • Voting Rights Act Debated in House. Friel, Brian; Smallen, Jill; Mitchell, Charlie // National Journal;7/15/2006, Vol. 38 Issue 28, p48 

    The article reports that the U.S. House of Representatives pursue a bill that will renew expiring provisions of the 1965 Voting Rights Act despite a protest by several rank-and-file conservatives. The reauthorization bill which is supported by Republican and Democratic leaders will extend...

  • Court Ordered To Reconsider Miss. Voting-Rights Case. Walsh, Mark // Education Week;4/1/1992, Vol. 11 Issue 28, p25 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme court has ordered a lower court to reconsider a Mississippi case in which the Justice Department has concluded that a 1986 law governing changes in school-district boundaries appears to dilute the political strength of some black voters. The Justice...

  • After the Swerve.  // Time;7/8/1957, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p12 

    The article focuses on U.S. Supreme Court's swerve into a liberal direction in handling cases bearing on individual rights versus government. U.S. Attorney General Herbert Brownell appeared before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee urging legislation to avert a miscarriage of justice due to the...

  • "A Firm Foundation".  // Time;3/14/1960, Vol. 75 Issue 11, p21 

    The article reports on the move of Supreme Court to press forward the cause of African Americans' the right to vote in the Southern States. It cites an overturning of the ruling of a U.S. district court in Georgia by the Supreme Court in relation to Civil Rights Act of 1957. It mentions that the...

  • Voting Rights. Peck, Robert S.; Williams, Charles F. // ABA Journal;Dec92, Vol. 78 Issue 12, p44 

    Presents an advance look at the case 'Voinovich v. Quilter,' before the U.S. Supreme Court, in which the Court will decide whether the Voting Rights Act provides a basis for challenging an Ohio redistricting plan. Ohio Speaker Pro Tempore Barney Quilter's challenge of the reapportionment plan.

  • Federal elections and the constitution. Slade, David C. // World & I;Aug98, Vol. 13 Issue 8, p84 

    Presents information on the two cases concerning a fundamental American right, which is the right to vote. Details on the case involving the Federal Elections Law; Information on a candidate's First Amendment right to participate in a televised debate; United States Supreme Court's decision on...

  • House overwhelmingly OK's Voting Rights Act renewal. Moorer, Talise D. // New York Amsterdam News;7/20/2006, Vol. 97 Issue 30, p4 

    The article reports that the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Reauthorization Bill, by a vote of 390 in favor and 33 in opposition. The bill was listed as House Resolution 9, which includes key provisions that were set to...

  • Busing. Savage, David C. // Education Digest;Jan1981, Vol. 46 Issue 5, p62 

    The article states that busing for desegregation may have reached the end of the road. A U.S. Senate vote against busing in late November 1980 was widely interpreted as an election reaction, but in fact, the same vote had been taken earlier, and with the same result. Both the U.S. House and...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics