TITLE

Dislocation Rate After Conversion from Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty

AUTHOR(S)
Sah, Alexander P.; Estok, II, Daniel M.
PUB. DATE
March 2008
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Mar2008, Vol. 90-A Issue 3, p506
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Revision hip arthroplasty is associated with a dislocation rate that is three to five times greater than the rate following primary hip replacement. Conversion of a hip hemiarthroplasty to a total hip replacement is a revision arthroplasty, but it differs from revisions of total hip arthroplasties because a native acetabulum is replaced and the subsequent prosthetic femoral head is smaller. It was our purpose to determine whether the risk of dislocation following conversion surgery is the same as or greater than that following revision total hip replacement. Methods: From 1994 to 2005, eighty-nine hemiarthroplasties were converted to a total hip arthroplasty in seventy- seven patients, and the results were compared with those of 115 first-time revision total hip replacements following a primary total hip replacement in 111 patients. A retrospective chart review was performed, and radiographic measurements were obtained. The patient demographics were similar between the two groups. The percentages of patients who had undergone revision of only the acetabular component as compared with both components as well as the percentages of those who had received a modular femoral stem as compared with a nonmodular stem were also similar between the two groups. Results: Postoperatively, the femoral head size and the positioning of the acetabular component were similar between the two groups. The acetabular components were significantly larger (p < 0.001) in the group in which a total hip arthroplasty had been revised because they required additional acetabular reaming for placement of a new component. There were significantly more dislocations after the conversion procedures (22%) than after the revisions of the total hip arthroplasties (10%) (p < 0.018). Within both groups, the size of the acetabular component, the intraoperative range of motion, and the positioning of the acetabular component were similar between the hips that dislocated and those that did not. However, smaller femoral head components were at greater risk for dislocation after conversion surgery than after revision of a total hip arthroplasty. Conclusions: A substantial reduction of the size of the prosthetic femoral head is unique to conversion arthroplasty and appears to play a role in instability after the revision surgery. While the smallest heads dislocated in the conversion group, a larger femoral head did not ensure stability. The increased dislocation risk with conversion surgery requires emphasis on soft-tissue balance and avoidance of excessive downsizing of the femoral head in an attempt to maximize hip stability. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
ACCESSION #
31375449

 

Related Articles

  • MINIMUM TEN-YEAR RESULTS OF PRIMARY BIPOLAR HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOR DEGENERATIVE ARTHRITIS OF THE HIP. Pellegrini Jr., Vincent D.; Heiges, Bradley A.; Bixler, Brian; Lehman, Erik B.; Davis III, Charles M. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Aug2006, Vol. 88-A Issue 8, p1817 

    Background: Bipolar hip arthroplasty has been advocated by some as an alternative to total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative arthritis of the hip. We sought to assess the results of this procedure at our institution after a minimum duration of follow-up of ten years. Methods: We...

  • The effect of patient position on blood loss in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty. Pace, Alistair; Yousef, Almunir // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Oct2008, Vol. 128 Issue 10, p1209 

    The total blood loss of 101 cemented primary total hip arthroplasties was studied in a prospective randomised study. Fifty of them were implanted in the supine position and 51 in the lateral position. The patients were matched for sex, height, weight and ASA grade. Only one surgeon carried out...

  • Optimizing success with lumbar disc arthroplasty. Gornet, Matthew; Schranck, Francine; Wharton, Nicholas; Beall, Douglas; Jones, Elizabeth; Myers, Mark; Hipp, John // European Spine Journal;Oct2014, Vol. 23 Issue 10, p2127 

    Purpose: This study aimed at determining the variables that may prove useful in predicting clinical outcomes following lumbar disc arthroplasty. Methods: Pre- and post-operative imaging assessments were obtained for 99 single-level lumbar disc arthroplasty patients from a prospective IDE study....

  • Athletic Activity After Total Joint Arthroplasty. Healy, William L.; Sharma, Sanjeev; Schwartz, Benjamin; Iorio, Richard // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Oct2008, Vol. 90-A Issue 10, p2245 

    The article presents an overview of medical concepts related to athletic activity after total joint arthroplasty which is performed to treat arthritis. A discussion of information which orthopedic surgeons should provide to patients who are considering athletic activity after arthroplasty is...

  • Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty (PATH): A Preliminary Report. Penenberg, Brad L.; Bolling, W. Seth; Riley, Michelle // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Nov2008 Supplement 4, Vol. 90-A, p209 

    The article presents the results of research which was done in an effort to present a new soft tissue sparing approach to total hip arthroplasty. Researchers wanted to develop the approach, called percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty, so that patients undergoing arthroplasty would not...

  • The Effect of a Single Infusion of Zoledronic Acid on Early Implant Migration in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Friedl, Gerald; Radl, Roman; Stihsen, Christoph; Rehak, Peter; Aigner, Reingard; Windhager, Reinhard // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Feb2009, Vol. 91-A Issue 2, p274 

    Aseptic loosening is the most frequent cause of implant failure in total hip arthroplasty. While a direct link between aseptic loosening and periprosthetic bone loss remains elusive, there is plentiful evidence for a close association with early implant migration. The present trial was primarily...

  • "MINIMALLY INVASIVE" TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. Berry, Daniel J. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Apr2005, Vol. 87-A Issue 4, p699 

    Comments on the introduction of the total hip arthroplasty to the orthopedic community. Information about the benefits of minimally minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty; Differences in the rates of complications of total hip arthroplasty; Methods of invasive total hip arthroplasty.

  • CATASTROPHIC COMPLICATIONS OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE HIP SURGERY. Fehring, Thomas K.; Mason, J. Bohannon // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Apr2005, Vol. 87-A Issue 4, p711 

    Focuses on the complications of invasive hip surgery. Advantages of the minimally invasive technique; Approaches to perform invasive hip replacement surgery; Presentation of a case of a woman who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty.

  • REVISION OF THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT WITHOUT CEMENT AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. Della Valle, Craig J.; Shuaipaj, Tasin; Berger, Richard A.; Rosenberg, Aaron G.; Shott, Susan; Jacobs, Joshua J.; Galante, Jorge O. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Aug2005, Vol. 87-A Issue 8, p1795 

    Abstract: We previously reported our results at a minimum of three and seven years after use of a porous-coated acetabular metal shell in a consecutive series of 138 revision total hip arthroplasties. The current report presents the longer-term outcomes of these procedures, at fifteen to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics