TITLE

Wirtschaftspolitisches forum

AUTHOR(S)
Homburg, Stefan; Karrenbrock, Holger; Eekhoff, Johann
PUB. DATE
April 2008
SOURCE
Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftspolitik;2008, Vol. 57 Issue 1, p44
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Stefan Homburg points out that in Germany commuting expenses have been deductible from the income tax base for a long time. Germany's grand coalition has now restricted this deduction. The article analyses whether or not this was justified from an economic point of view. It is shown that, in the long run, the tax treatment of commuting expenses has nothing to do with production efficiency. Commuting rather represents a form of household production. The overall conclusion is that the more restrictive tax treatment seems economically justifiable. Whereas Holger Karrenbrock deals with the arguments of the proponents of the so-called 'Werkstorprinzip', a principle which means that for tax purposes the sphere of occupational activity ends at the factory gate. He demonstrates that expenses for commuting to and from work are income-related and therefore have to be tax deductible. The commutation to and from work is a condition precedent to income production, and the corresponding expenses solely arise from the taxpayer's occupation, which both is essential in his opinion. Johann Eekhoff, however, emphasizes that since 2007, costs of commuting in Germany are in principle no longer deductible from taxable income. This change in taxation is appreciated because commuting costs can be substituted by housing costs. Generally speaking, the sum of both cost factors is the same at any distances from work. Only for married couples costs of a second household near the workplace should be tax-deductible if both partners are employed at different places.
ACCESSION #
31259981

 

Related Articles

  • On March 15 We Reek With Deductible Virtue.  // Saturday Evening Post;3/13/1948, Vol. 220 Issue 37, p156 

    The article comments on the apparent generosity that comes over the taxpaying public in the U.S. when the deadline to file their income tax comes around every March 15. It cites how the taxpayer regrets not giving more to charities and churches, while celebrating the high interest he paid on his...

  • Frequently Asked Multistate Tax Questions.  // Journal of State Taxation;Summer2002, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p95 

    Provides the states that permit the deduction of federal income taxes for state corporate tax purposes in the U.S. Percent deduction of federal income tax in Alabama and Iowa; Limitation of the deduction for federal income taxes; Use of the unitary business concept and combined reporting.

  • Computing child allowances.  // Accountancy;Jun72, Vol. 83 Issue 946, p80 

    Answers queries relating to accounting for child allowances in Great Britain as of June 1972. Formula for computing child allowances; Interaction of child relief and the provisions relating to aggregation of a child's income with that of his parent; Computation for income taxation.

  • Investment commentary. Preston // Grand Rapids Business Journal;12/06/99, Vol. 17 Issue 49, p26 

    Suggests potential tax-saving ideas for 1999. Giving appreciated securities to a charity; Deductibility of an individual retirement account contribution for those who have met eligibility requirements; Quarterly estimation of tax payments for income not subject to withholding tax; Deadlines to...

  • More Itemized Deductions. Bernstein, Marc // Back Stage;02/02/2001, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p15 

    Discusses the itemized deductions for actors' taxes in the United States. Deductible taxes; Charitable contributions; Rules for changes in the name of the taxpayer; Background of the Child Tax Credit.

  • Rules on NOL Carryforward Loosened Somewhat. Williams, Leonard W. // Outlook;Fall99, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p56 

    Deals with the rules on the carryback period for losses arising in tax years beginning August 5, 1997. Rule on casualty losses in California; Claim of educational credits; News on building component deductions.

  • Why a true flat tax could flatten you. Dowd, Ann Reilly // Money;Jan1996, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p84 

    Reports on the need to overhaul the federal income tax code. How Republican presidential candidates are pushing for a tax reform; Findings of a poll of 757 Americans on tax reform; Information on a flat tax; What could happen if a flat tax is implemented.

  • Mirror deducts correctly. Greene, Chris; Maddalena, Christina // Accountancy;Sep92, Vol. 110 Issue 1189, p118 

    Reviews the Great Britain-based tax law case 'Booth v Mirror Group Newspaper plc.' High Court's decision that a payment by a third party to a company's employee was subject to deduction of income tax under the PAYE regulations; Deduction of basic rate income tax in accordance with the Income...

  • Simple Facts About Income Tax. Norman, Winston // Saturday Evening Post;3/12/1938, Vol. 210 Issue 37, p24 

    Discusses the problem with income tax deduction in the U.S. Comparison of marriage with a corporation; Criticism against the tax administration.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics