TITLE

Credit Default Swaps Discussed

AUTHOR(S)
Lehmann, R. J.
PUB. DATE
March 2008
SOURCE
Best's Review;Mar2008, Vol. 108 Issue 11, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the feedback of regulators from the key domicile states of New York, Wisconsin and Maryland on the views of the Capital Markets and Insurance Subcommittee concerning the regulatory reform of the financial guaranty insurance sector in the U.S. Regulators express their concern about how far the monoline sector was permitted to diverge from its historical focus of guaranteeing investors in municipal obligations timely principal and interest payments in case of default.
ACCESSION #
31203357

 

Related Articles

  • Risk retention groups win round in Oklahoma. Geisel, Jerry // Business Insurance;9/2/2002, Vol. 36 Issue 35, p4 

    Reports the victory of the risk retention group (RRG) on issues concerning surety bond requirement and antifraud fee in Oklahoma. Legality of surety bond requirements; Response on the complaints of RRG regarding antifraud fees; Exemption from the surety bond requirement and antifraud fees.

  • Bill Seeking Amendment Of P/C Guaranty Fund Called Threat To Small Policyholders, System.  // Insurance Advocate;2/25/2002, Vol. 113 Issue 8, p22 

    Focuses on a legislative bill in Virginia which seeks to amend the laws governing the state's property/casualty guaranty fund.

  • Credit enhancement bill is worth supporting.  // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;5/2/94, Vol. 98 Issue 18, p58 

    Editorial. Makes observations concerning legislation in New York allowing financial guaranty companies to offer credit enhancement for insurance products. Provisions under bill; Opposition to bill by trade organizations; Impact of bill on guaranty funds; Panic over insurance company credit...

  • FIDELITY INSURANCE CLAIMS. Lovret, Robert // Internal Auditor;Apr2000, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p58 

    Provides information about fidelity insurance and bonds. Standards of fidelity insurance policy; Comparison between fidelity insurance and fidelity bonds; Procedures for filing claims for fidelity insurance and bonds.

  • Both Houses Get Bill To Update, Modernize Financial Guaranty Insurance Under Article 69.  // Insurance Advocate;5/10/2004, Vol. 115 Issue 18, p47 

    Reports on the move of the New York Legislature to update and modernize Article 69 of the Insurance Law in relation to financial guaranty insurance. Operation under the strict risk-based capital provisions; Imposition of strong capitalization, reserving and capital-to-risk requirements;...

  • Fidelity and surety law. Leslie, Robert E. // Defense Counsel Journal;July96, Vol. 63 Issue 3, p402 

    Reports on developments in fidelity and surety law in the United States of interest to all defense counsel. Includes the Texas Supreme Court ruling that there is no common law duty of good faith and fair dealing between a performance bond surety and the obligee; Ruling of Arizona and California...

  • Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies. Thornton, Randy // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;7/2/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 127, p39322 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Department of the Treasury Circular 570 regarding companies holding certificates of authority as acceptable reinsuring and sureties on Federal bonds. It says that the copies of the Circular and interim changes might be gathered directly from the...

  • Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 2001--Part I. May, Ronald A.; Welbaum, R. Earl; Marmor, Randall I.; Sauer, Roger P.; Linder Jr., Charled W. // Defense Counsel Journal;Jan2002, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p88 

    Examines some cases on surety and fidelity law in the U.S. in 2001. U.S. versus American States Insurance Co. about public construction bonds; Few versus Capitol Materials Inc. about the liability of surety; Conestoga Title Insurance Co. versus Premier Title Agency Inc. about employee dishonesty.

  • Former California gov. in flap over Proposition 103 dispute. Haggerty, Alfred G. // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;2/21/94, Vol. 98 Issue 8, p2 

    Reports on former California Governor George Deukmeijan's representation of the Surety Company of the Pacific in a legal dispute concerning Proposition 103. Validity of law exempting surety insurance from provisions of Proposition 103; Claims that Duekmeijan's role in dispute erodes the judiciary.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics