TITLE

A Supreme Court Decision Fosters Litigation

AUTHOR(S)
Roberts, Eugene
PUB. DATE
December 1999
SOURCE
Nieman Reports;Winter99/Spring2000, Vol. 53/54 Issue 4/1, p88
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Contends that the United States (US) case Times versus Sullivan has resulted in litigation against criticism by private citizens and the press in the US. Overview of the case; Defamation and libel trials against the press in the US; Civil law suits against private citizens in the US.
ACCESSION #
3008367

 

Related Articles

  • Libel? You'll Have to Prove It. Hickey, Neil // Columbia Journalism Review;Nov/Dec2001, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p57 

    Recalls the decision of the United States Supreme Court on the New York Times versus Sullivan libel case. Highlights of the case; Effects of the case; Most conspicuous libel action of subsequent years.

  • NEW YORK TIMES V. SULLIVAN.  // Communication: Journalism Education Today;Spring2007, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p26 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. It is a case that established the actual malice standard before considering press reports as a form of defamation or libel. The decision in the case demonstrates the support for freedom of the press. Facts of the...

  • A Newsworthiness Privilege for Republished Defamation of Public Figures. Donnelly, Matthew J. // Iowa Law Review;3/1/2009, Vol. 94 Issue 3, p1023 

    When the media knowingly republish defamation of public figures, the media are subject to possible libel actions by the defamed parties to the same extent as the original defaming parties, even when the defamatory statements are themselves newsworthy in context. This is the dilemma created by...

  • Casual Conversation or Constitutional Conspiracy: Controverting the Origins of New York Times v. Sullivan. Smith, Susan Lindley // Free Speech Yearbook;2005, Vol. 42, p1 

    The article discusses a court case filed by Lester Bruce Sullivan, the former Public Safety Commissioner of Alabama, against the newspaper "The New York Times." The case was regarding an advertisement published in the newspaper about Sullivan, which he considered harmful to his reputation. The...

  • "Actual Malice" in U.S. Defamation Law: The Minority of One Doctrine in the World? Youm, Kyu Ho // Journal of International Entertainment & Media Law;2011-2012, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p1 

    The article presents an analysis of the methods in which actual malice, an important aspect of defamation law in the U.S., has been adapted and reimagined in other jurisdictions around the world. It informs that in an American perspective, the "actual malice" rule, which the U.S. Supreme Court...

  • Policy on complaints about nonacceptance of 'editorial advertising'.  // Columbia Journalism Review;Sep/Oct1978, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p91 

    This article provides information on the lack of policy of the National News Council relating to the fairness of decisions by news organizations on the acceptability of advertising. The reasons behind the decision of the organization not to accept complaints concerning commercial advertising...

  • New York Times v. Sullivan: Civil Rights, Libel Law, and the Free Press. Wallace, David // American Journalism;Winter2012, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p119 

    The article reviews the book "New York Times v. Sullivan: Civil Rights, Libel Law, and the Free Press," by Kermit Hall and Melvin Urofsky.

  • License to Hunt.  // Wilson Quarterly;Winter2004, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p107 

    Examines the article "Judging Reputation: Realism and Common Law in Justice White's Defamation Jurisprudence," by John C. P. Goldberg, published in the Fall 2003 issue of the "University of Colorado Review." Overview of the 1964 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on the case "New York Times"...

  • WHITHER THE "PATHS OF GLORY": THE SCOPE OF THE NEW YORK TIMES RULE IN DEFAMATION CLAIMS BY FORMER PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND CANDIDATES. King, Joseph H. // Vermont Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p275 

    The article analyzes the scope of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, supporting the freedom of the press, with regard to defamation claims by former public officials. It presents an analysis of the status of a former public official in various situations like when...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics