Kessler, David
January 2008
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter2008, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p423
Academic Journal
The article argues that the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the ruling of lower courts over the Timothy Scott v. Victor Harris case, which had denied summary judgment to a defendant who claimed qualified immunity, encroached on the jury's fact-finding role. Harris claimed that he had been unreasonably seized by Scott, a police officer, who had rammed this car off the road to end a high speed car chase, leaving him paralyzed. This paper primarily explores the limitations of video evidences cited by the Court to come up with its ruling.


Related Articles

  • Will Court Find for Cop Who Protected Society? Jeffrey, Terence P. // Human Events;3/5/2007, Vol. 63 Issue 9, p5 

    The article comments on the case filed by Victor Harris against Georgia Deputy Timothy Scott. The author criticizes the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case. He also detailed the car incident involving Harris and Scott. The author mentions that the Court argues that it is not...

  • High-speed police chases upheld by Supreme Court. Hofmann, Mark A. // Business Insurance;5/7/2007, Vol. 41 Issue 19, p30 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case of Timothy Scott vs. Victor Harris. According to the court, police can use potentially deadly force to end a high-speed chase that puts the public at risk. The court rejected Harris' argument that safety could have been...

  • "THE RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY SHALL BE PRESERVED": LIMITING THE APPEALABILITY OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDERS DENYING QUALIFIED IMMUNITY. Herzberg, Arielle // University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law;2015, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p305 

    The article discusses decisions of several courts in cases related to qualified immunity summary judgment including decision of the Sixth Circuit Court in Romo v. Largen, decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. Jones, Scott v. Harris, Mitchell v. Forsyth and Plumhoff v. Rickard.

  • A Twice-Told Tale: Plausibility and Narrative Coherence in Judicial Storytelling. Rideout, J. Christopher // Legal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD;Fall2013, Vol. 10, p67 

    The article focuses on the decision of the case Scott v. Harris in the U.S. It examines the main story of the case that questions the use of deadly force and qualified immunity based on the narrative and plausibility structure of the facts presented in the court. It also mentions the controversy...

  • Court gives OK to officers' actions in high-speed chase. Sherman, Mark // Buffalo Law Journal;5/7/2007, Vol. 79 Issue 37, p4 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court against 19-year-old Victor Harris, who was paralyzed after his car was run off the road by police officer Timothy Scott for speeding. The court held that police may use tactics that put fleeing suspects at risk of death to end...

  • Cognitive Illiberalism, Summary Judgment, and Title VII: An Examination of Ricci v. DeStefano. MCGINLEY, ANN C. // New York Law School Law Review;2012/2013, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p865 

    The article focuses on the concepts of cognitive illiberalism and irrelevant grants of summary judgment under Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act for employment discrimination cases by the U.S. courts. It discusses in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Ricci v. DeStefano that the Court granted...

  • THE IMAGE CANNOT SPEAK FOR ITSELF: FILM, SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND VISUAL LITERACY. Mezey, Naomi // Valparaiso University Law Review;Fall2013, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Scott v. Harris, which dealt with Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Topics include the admissibility of video evidence during litigation, the granting of summary judgment by judges, and the problems that a lack of visual literacy causes when video...

  • SCOTT V. HARRIS AND THE FUTURE OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Wolff, Tobias Barrington // Nevada Law Journal;Summer2015, Vol. 15 Issue 3., p1351 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Scott v. Harris case and the reformulation of the summary judgment standards in the country. Topics include the categorization of the qualified immunity defense, Fourth Amendment ruling, and expansion of appellate jurisdiction under the...

  • Supreme Court Cases 2006-2007 Term.  // FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin;Nov2007, Vol. 76 Issue 11, p25 

    This section presents several U.S. Supreme Court cases that were decided in significance to law enforcement, from 2006 to 2007. In Los Angeles County, California v. Rettele, the court held that law enforcement officers acted reasonably while executing a search warrant. The Scott v. Harris case...


Read the Article

Other Topics