More hospitals pledge no charges for adverse events

March 2008
Same-Day Surgery;Mar2008, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p29
Academic Journal
The article reports on the announcement of the Massachusetts Hospital Association that all state hospitals will adopt a uniform policy to not charge patients or insurers for certain serious adverse events, including wrong-site surgeries, as defined by the National Quality Forum.


Related Articles

  • DSH slashed by $13 billion. Hawkins, James A. // Physician Executive;Sep/Oct1997, Vol. 23 Issue 7, p5 

    Reports on the legislative proposal aimed to reduce disproportionate share payments to hospitals that serve large number of poor and uninsured individuals in the United States.

  • Surcharge backed.  // Crain's New York Business;8/21/95, Vol. 11 Issue 34, p31 

    Reports that the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that self-insured companies in New York must continue to pay the 13 percent state surcharge on hospital rates. Supreme Court's ruling on the pension benefits law; Plaintiffs.

  • Mkt. turmoil after N.Y. hospital rate deregulation. Bell, Allison // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;1/20/97, Vol. 101 Issue 3, p32 

    Looks at how changes in New York state hospital rate laws could affect the bills of employers who missed a December 1996 filing deadline. Explanation of the changes made; Impact of the rules on out-of-state companies that maintain permanent New York operations; Concerns surrounding these changes.

  • Plan exempt from surcharge.  // Business Insurance;3/7/94, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p2 

    Reports on a ruling by United States District Judge Jose A. Cabranes on hospital surcharge exemption. Exemption of the New England Health Care Employees Union District from paying a Connecticut hospital surcharge; Amount of surcharge; Use of surcharge; Surcharge as violating the provisions of...

  • Lessons for states in inpatient ratesetting under the Boren Amendment. Batavia, Andrew I.; Ozminkowski, Ronald J. // Health Care Financing Review;Winter93, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p137 

    Summarizes the results of Boren Amendment cases regarding inpatient ratesetting methodologies that have been decided by the courts in the United States. Requirement of reasonable principle analysis of payment rates; Procedural issues; Substantive issues; Definitional issues; Budgetary...

  • Hospital rates saved. Harrington, John // Crain's New York Business;4/3/95, Vol. 11 Issue 14, p34 

    Reports on the decision of the United States Congress to extend a provision allowing New York to continue a hospital surcharge that helps pay for care for the poor and uninsured.

  • N.Y. thinks surcharges will stand. Geisel, Jerry // Business Insurance;03/10/97, Vol. 31 Issue 10, p6 

    Comments on the view of New York officials that the state's controversial 1996 law which imposes large surcharges on hospital and other medical care bills will survive court challenges. Law suits made agianst the law; Ability of employers and insurers to negotiate hospital rates.

  • Surcharge upheld. Harrington, John // Crain's New York Business;5/1/95, Vol. 11 Issue 18, p38 

    Reports that the Supreme Court upheld the practice of New York State of raising revenues by adding surcharges to hospital bills. Ruling as a setback for commercial insurers; Insurers' contention that the state was violating federal laws.

  • N.Y. reforms offer savings for employers on health bills. Geisel, Jerry // Business Insurance;7/22/96, Vol. 30 Issue 30, p2 

    Reports on the implications of New York's Health Care Reform Act of 1996, a new law that will deregulate hospital rates. Projected moderation of the group health care cost in the state; Important aspects of the law; Opening up of hospital rates to negotiation; Scrapping of a 13 percent surcharge...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics